does it not seem that it is exactly in the lower
end housing market, and in the-sideline-housing
(where the homeless 250,000 people presumably
are waiting to get a better life in a SFD home)
where sprinklers would bring the biggest bang for
the buck?

Has anyone REALLY calculated the savings incurred
from reduced fire (not EMT) response teams in a residentially
sprinklered community?

Your argument makes sense in the black-and-white
of a manifesto.  But it doesn´t sit quite right in my gut.
That is what this forum is for:  debating the issues.
My gut vs your facts.

scot deal
excelsior fire





On 4/25/07, John Drucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Facts about Sprinklers from the National Association of Home Builders

The home building industry is dedicated to the safety of the communities
in
which they build.

That's the reason why the National Association of Home Builders supports
programs that encourage the installation and maintenance of smoke alarm
systems in all homes.

Home builders have a vested interest in the safety of their products both
during the building process and after the house becomes someone's home.
Whenever changes are proposed to the building codes that govern how homes
are constructed in each community, the home builder acts as a consumer
advocate. It's the home builder's role to make sure that these proposals
are
necessary and that they are cost effective before they are adopted so that
homes stay affordable. For each $1,000 added to the price of a home,
another
250,000 potential home buyers are forced to remain on the sidelines.

Home builders would never diminish the important role that cost-effective
building codes play in providing for occupant safety and health; in fact,
new homes are safer than ever.  However, as a society, we cannot afford to
deny needed housing for the sake of new requirements without proven
benefits.

While they should remain an option for home owners who choose them, fire
sprinklers in single-family homes are expensive to install, can be
difficult
to maintain and do not represent a cost-effective safety improvement over
smoke alarm systems. For that reason, NAHB does not support measures to
mandate their use.

http://www.smokealarmswork.org/firesprinklers/index.html


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to