Bob, 
It comes down to the way the AHJ is interpreting this section of NFPA 13
and what was type of wall actually constructed versus what may have been
or is required.  If the wall is 8" block floor to ceiling but there are
two openings in it that are unprotected then the wall does not provide
for occupancy separation per the building code and is treated as if it
doesn't exist.  It sounds like the issue your friend is dealing with is
more of an architectural issue dealing with dissimilar occupancies.

The "separation" is very much about the spread of fire from one area to
the next.  It is complementary to the sprinkler systems and very
integral in large buildings or buildings with adjacent dissimilar
occupancies.  

While the draft curtain analogy is similar, it's primary function is to
limit the unnecessary activation of sprinklers while the fire
partition/separation/barrier is more of a distinct, complete, physical
separation between to spaces.  Two totally different functions from a
building code standpoint.

But I would be curious why the AHJ does not believe this wall is a
sufficient separation.

Again, what does the code call for between the two areas?  If they did
not meet that requirement then NFPA 13 says to extend the higher density
15ft into the less demanding adjacent occupancy, end of story.

Like I said, limitation of sprinkler activation is not the main purpose
for fire barriers.  It's to prevent the spread of fire from one area to
another.



Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Group
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lg.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Knight
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 12:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Barrier / Partition Definition

Craig,
I think that you are over analyzing this situation.  There is no mention
in
13 for this to be a "fire" rated anything.  This barrier / partition is
merely for heat containment for the purpose of sprinkler activation or
lack thereof, not the spread of fire.

Thank you,

Bob Knight

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 7:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Barrier / Partition Definition

The definition of fire wall, fire partition, fire barrier comes from the
building code.  If using the IBC see Chapter 7.   Depending on the
occupancies and the level of sprinkler protection you may or may not be
required to provide one of the three.  Each one has slightly different
characteristics as defined.  The Fire Wall being the most stringent
where the assembly extends from the slab to or even through the roof and
is capable of maintaining its structural integrity even if the building
on either or both sides would collapse.  A fire partition  is a physical
separation designed with fire resistant materials whose purpose is to
prevent the spread of fire from one area to the next.  A fire partition
is not "rated".   The fire barrier is a rated assembly but not to the
extent of the Fire Wall.  All have protected openings as well.

The wall, barrier and partition are designed to protect one occupancy
from fire spread from an adjacent occupancy.  They have a different
purpose than a draft curtain.

As far as the scenario described, if the openings are not protected with
either fire doors or shutters or an accepted (by the AHJ) water spray
curtain, then by definition it does not qualify as a Code defined
separation. It would provide no real separation and his assessment of
requiring the extension of the higher density into the lesser density
protected area would be correct.

So the question is, do the openings have any kind of automatic closures,
is the wall rated, is the wall required to be rated or just one of the
lesser assemblies?  Still a few outstanding questions needing to be
answered in order to make a definitive determination.


Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Group
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lg.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Knight
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 5:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Barrier / Partition Definition

Does anyone have a good definition for what 11.1.2 means by "Barrier" or
"Partition" (NFPA 13 2002 ed).  I have a friend who has an AHJ telling
him that an 8" concrete full height wall with two door openings in it
does not qualify. My understanding of this is that this is a perfectly
acceptable barrier since the purpose of the barrier is to prevent fusing
of the sprinklers from one area to another.  The reason the question
arises is that this AHJ wants to extend a new .55 / 2500 sf area through
the concrete wall and into an existing .2 / 1500 sf system. Without
being too obvious, the original system has no possibility of providing
this density, let alone the proper spacing of sprinklers. Anyway, any
help will be appreciated.

Thank you,

Bob Knight, CET
(208) 495-2057
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.firebyknight.com


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.0/957 - Release Date:
8/16/2007
1:46 PM
 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.1/962 - Release Date:
8/20/2007
1:08 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.1/962 - Release Date:
8/20/2007
1:08 PM
 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to