I am aware of at least two Western states -I'm sure there are MANY
others nationwide - where homebuilders who are dealing with partial or
blanket sprinkler ordinances are complaining to local and state AHJ's
that they can't get sprinkler contractors to respond to requests for
proposals on 13D and small-format 13R projects.  I have seen and read
proposals for 2500-3000 sq. ft. single-family sprinkler systems that
were $5/sq. ft. (and higher) for the building system only.   Like most
everything else in the built environment, this isn't ultimately about
training or human resources or operational programming, it's about cost.
And the truth of the matter is, as George says, we have boogered up more
than our share of projects as an industry because of bad practices,
inadequate training, continuing ed', etc., etc.   

But there's also an absolute truth about homebuilders that our industry
is going to have to address at the levels of marketing and diplomacy.  I
have had business or correspondence with numerous regional offices of
the "Big 10" homebuilders - Centex, Pulte, Toll, DR Horton, etc.
Universally, there is a preference for expanding existing contracts with
their plumbers in lieu of adding another sub to the team.   Why?
Two-fold; first is that they have a comfort zone with the big plumbers.
Second (and the part we have to address) is as noted above, that they
can't consistently get good pricing or even timely responses to requests
for proposals.   Of course this is not everywhere, every day but it has
happened often enough to further ingrain the institutionalized
resistance that the homebuilders have against sprinklers and in too many
cases sprinkler contractors.   Don't take my word for it Greg - the
market will speak (as it has been speaking already, in some areas) for
itself, and will do so without consideration for whether our hat says,
"Sprinkie" or "Stuff Flows Downhill".

Tim - I appreciate your acknowledgment.  Most people who know me would
agree that I'm generally very kind and understanding ... LMAO :o)

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George
Church
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fire Systems and Plumbers

Greg, there are enough terrible jobs being done by our own industry that
we
should refrain from throwing rocks at mechanicals/plumbers.

I'm sure, like me, you try very hard to toe the line in your sphere of
control, but alas, there are plenty of non-compliant jobs being
installed by
sprinkies that are either ignorant or relying on "but that's what was
specified" if not out-and-out greed.

Seriously, how many 30' tall spec/flex buildings are protected to OH2 by
sprinkler guys?

I'm not saying plumbers are the answer, or that they do better or worse
than
sprinkler contractors. The reality is we've abandoned the market segment
by
never showing up in force.

glc

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
McGahan
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fire Systems and Plumbers

Ok, so their pond has better candidates for designers than our pond
which is
the USA? No, they will have unqualified people designing and you are
still
going to have AHJ's that do not know the code letting them get away with
inadequate work. 

I am sorry but I do not know the answer but bringing in another trade
will
get more work done, but not done better.

Thank you,
Greg McGahan

Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Minkel
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fire Systems and Plumbers

 I think the mechanical contractors are fishing in a way bigger pond
than
the sprinkler contractors are.


Bill Minkel, Designer
Western States Fire Protection, Dallas
NFPA Member #2578666

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
McGahan
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fire Systems and Plumbers

OK, so the plumbers are going to "miraculously" do what the sprinkler
industry can't and immediately discover qualified designers behind the
rocks
OR they are going to be able to train them effectively when we can not?

I am crying foul here - I don't care what code you are using D, R or
full
13, the issue is the same. I know we have spent money and time trying to
train and I am sure you more experienced guys have spent exponentially
more
than us "young" guys. The problem is deeper - MANY Americans do not want
to
work in ANY field and they definitely REFUSE to take responsibility for
their own lives and careers.

Bring me a person of character and integrity and I can train them and
they
will work if they have basic natural ability. I have seen many, dozens
of
people with the natural ability fail repeatedly due to character and
integrity issues.

I am sure the plumbers will take and perform the work; but I am even
more
certain that they will have the same problems we already do to a much
larger
degree and with less accountability.

Thank you,
Greg McGahan

Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Vining
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fire Systems and Plumbers

Not quite.  The NEC has the requirements for wiring of fire alarm
systems,
but NFPA 72 (laughingly called the National Fire Alarm Code) stands on
its
own.

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Timothy W Goins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Big difference, NFPA 72 is part of the electrical code, or it was the 
> last  time I checked.
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Drucker
>  Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 8:43 PM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: RE: Fire Systems and Plumbers
>
>
>
>  No different then Electrical Contractors that install Line Voltage  
> Interconnected Smoke/Carbon Monoxide Alarms in Homes versus Alarm  
> contractors that install Low Voltage Fire Alarm Systems.
>
>  Bottom line its about cost. The plumbing contractor who installs
sprinklers
>  as an extension of the plumbing system is no different then the
electrical
>  contractor who installs smoke alarms as an extension of the 
> electrical  system.
>
>  As for the NFPA, do they really "represent" any particular trade or
merely
>  fire safety interests as a whole ?
>
>  John Drucker
>  Fire Protection Subcode Official (AHJ)  New Jersey
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Leyton
>  Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:13 PM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: RE: Fire Systems and Plumbers
>
>  Booyah!  Well put, oh great poobah of sprinkie-stuff.  This is the
dirty
>  little secret (or 600-lb. gorilla in the living room, depending on
your
>  perspective) that I was alluding to in my rant a few weeks back about
>  large plumbing contractors moving into residential sprinklers.
Unless
>  we (WE, the fire sprinkler community, inclusive) seriously ramp up
our
human
>  and training resources for designers and installers, it will be
impossible
>  to deal with the flood of proposal requests that are
>  inevitable.   This has been recognized and in some cases is already
>  being acted upon by certain plumbing firms on a regional basis.
>
>  Back to Timothy's question (aren't you glad you opened THIS can of
worms
>  Tim-bo?); presuming it was a Uponor system you saw advertised, keep
in
>  mind that they're market-making right now.   And the NFPA Journal is
one
>  of several publications in which they're advertising, along with
Rehau
who
>  manufactures the only other PEX product approved for 13D systems at
the
>  moment.  If you don't want to see fire protection ads directed at
plumbers,
>  then you'll also definitely want to avoid PM Engineer and Contractor
>  magazine too.
>
>  Steve Leyton
>  Protection Design & Consulting
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Muncy
>  Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:01 PM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: Re: Fire Systems and Plumbers
>
>  For multi-systems, there are currently several states that REQUIRE
>  that a licensed plumber install the system because they are
considered
>  an extension of the domestic water supply.  Fire sprinkler
contractors
>  are PROHIBITED from installing such systems, unless of  course they
>  have a plumbing license -- but the system is still being installed
>  under the plumbing license.  And when those systems are inspected,
>  they will be inspected by Plumbing officials - not the fire marshal.
>
>  Multi-purpose systems have  been been recognized as acceptable in
>  NFPA-13D for a long time but it was not until fairly recently that
use
>  use accelerated.  New changes being incorporated into the
>  International Plumbing Code offer a simplified design for multi-
>  purpose systems that does not require hydraulic calcs but is based on
>  distance and water pressure. My understanding is that the NFPA-13D
>  committee has accepted the language proposed in the IPC proposal.  By
>  the way, it was the International Association of Fire Chiefs who
>  recommended the code change to add the simplified procedure to the
IPC.
>
>  Bottom line is that you are going to see a lot more of these systems
>  in the future.  It is likely that most "lower-end" homes will adopt
>  the multi-purpose approach and larger, more expensive homes will have
>  a standalone system.
>
>  When (not IF) the International Residential Code moves the
>  requirements for sprinklers in single-family dwellings from the
>  appendix to the body of the code, thus making it required, the number
>  of residential systems will EXPLODE. Sure, there will be battles on
>  the local level to remove that requirement, but it is more difficult
>  to remove a provision from the code on a local level.
>
>  Think about this - based on the number of new homes built in 2007,
>  each and every fire sprinkler contractor in the country would have to
>  install 375 single-family fire sprinkler systems.  That is how big
>  this market will eventually be, and most fire sprinkler contractors
>  don't do many single-family systems when there are plenty of more
>  lucrative commercial jobs to dedicate the limited number of employees
>  to.
>
>  If plumbers are going to do this work.... and they will.... let's
just
>  hope that they feel the need to acquire some TRAINING on the subject
>  before they jump head-first into the fire protection business.
>
>
>
>
>  Steve Muncy, CAE                         Fire Sprinklers Save Lives!
>  American Fire Sprinkler Assn.
>  Dallas, TX
>
>
>
>  On Mar 24, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Timothy W Goins wrote:
>  > Why would the NFPA journal, MAR/APR 2008 edition, use an advertiser
>  > for
>  > residential piping systems that ONLY recommends plumbers to install
>  > their
>  > product? I know the answer is money, but I thought they were
looking
>  > out for
>  > our industry and it's standards, both written and installed.
>  >
>  > Isn't this like having an architect layout "design" fire sprinkler
>  > systems?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Sprinklerforum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>  To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>  _______________________________________________
>  Sprinklerforum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>  To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Sprinklerforum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>  To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Sprinklerforum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>  To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



-- 
Ed Vining
4819 John Muir Rd
Martinez CA 94553
925-228-879
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to