It's all over the cover sheet "R-2 occupancy" and specifically states "NFPA
#13R" for the design criteria so I don't know how the original FP contractor
could get away with something different.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> IBC 903.3.1.3 permits 13D systems in one- and two-family dwellings.  The
> definition of a dwelling (IBC page 14) is a building that contains one
> or two dwelling units.  Unless you have a building separation wall in
> there somewhere it looks like the 13D approach would be prohibited by
> 2006 IBC.  I don't think the floor would count as this separation.  13R
> systems are installed in "buildings of Group R".  You seem to be dealing
> with a building of Group R with four dwelling units, not a dwelling with
> a maximum of two dwelling units.  Therefore R not D.
>
> Just my reading, others may differ.
>
> Bill Brooks
>
> William N. Brooks, P.E.
> Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
> 372 Wilett Drive
> Severna Park, MD 21146
> 410-544-3620 Phone
> 410-544-3032 FAX
> 412-400-6528 Cell
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: 13R system with individual risers calc to 13D?
> From: Roland Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, November 18, 2008 6:21 pm
> To: [email protected]
>
> What does the IBC say? If there were townhouses (not since units
> divided per floor), then a 13D could be used with minimal rated
> separation per the IRC. The code drives the allowed type of system,
> not how small you make each individual system. Make sure the tamper
> switches are electrically monitored so it is known when one of the
> risers in the middle of the building is shut-down.
>
> Roland
>
> On Nov 18, 2008, at 11:26 AM, IPA wrote:
>
> > I have a residential complex consisting of two story units with two
> > individual units per floor. Obviously this would fall under 13R
> > however in
> > this case the owner wants each unit to have it's own seperate riser
> > control,
> > it's own underground feed etc... each unit is 100% independant from
> > the
> > others. In this case could this system be calculated to 13D criteria
> > (2 head
> > calc) seeing how each system is serving only one family's unit? What
> > do you
> > think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> > For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to