Tom:
 
Is the outside hopper a cyclone collector?  Sounds like it might be.  
 
I worked on a bindery fire a few years back where the scrap collection system 
carried the trimmings to a cyclone collector that also had a bag house on top.  
The heavier paper trimmings dropped to the bottom of the cyclone and the dusty 
air filtered through the bags (long tubes of cloth).  Periodically, a shaker 
mechanism agitated the bags and shook the dust cake off, which dropped into the 
bottom of the cyclone.  In addition to carrying paper trimmings, it also 
carried staples, other stray metal pieces and stray cigarets.  Don't know if we 
ever figured out what caused a fire in the collector (scrap metal sparking in 
the ductwork, or employee's cigaret in the collector), but when the shaker 
operated, a dust explosion blew the collector apart.  Sprinklers would not have 
helped that scenario.
 
This sounds like one that you may want to step away from, or study a lot about 
the system before you commit to any plan.
 
Dave 

David A. de Vries, P.E., CSP 
Firetech Engineering Incorporated 




--- On Mon, 9/20/10, Chris Cahill <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Chris Cahill <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Book binding Facility
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, September 20, 2010, 4:02 PM


Sounds more like a woodworking dust collection system to me with a larger
variety of sizes of 'dust'.  It's common enough to provide duct detection
suppression systems to prevent a hot spot from getting to the hopper and
sprinkler(s) in the hopper (usually anti-freeze). I'm sure you know this
already.  

I actually think there is language in the IFC/IMC (and MN amendments) (I
don't have any of the above) addressing ducts that carry combustibles.
Enclosing and putting in SW will have marginal effects as I'm assuming the
hopper is closed.  Don't spend the money on the enclosure and put it into
good sprinklers/suppression. And when things go wrong even when suppressed
the smoke goes to the sky instead of into the building.  Building additions
may open another can of code worms. 

Oh and recommend a FPE, in writing, as the insurer this year isn't qualified
to address things like this legally or for the next insurer.  As an aside I
wonder how the insurance industry allows their people to make
recommendations that are subject to possible failure, causing subrogation
within a company(?) and amount to legal engineering without an engineer
often times. And yes in your proposal state you have not dreamed this up,
you have no opinion on whether it will work or not.  I've actually stated in
proposals what we were asked to do would not be effective, didn't mince
words.    

Chris Cahill  

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Duross
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Book binding Facility

Got a call this morning and took a tour of a book binding facility that had
a fire.
It's a fairly large (60K SF +/-) plant with 2 dry systems, tapered steel
beam, purlin construction, insulated and heated, 20' ceilings.  It has a
paper collection system running from about 20 of these stitchers and binders
that exits the building to a hopper with the blowers next to it.
The fire occurred in the hopper, outside the building but melt and deformed
the purlin steel wall pretty good.  Apparently, the sprinkler system never
tripped.
I was given a letter from their insurer suggesting when they replace the
blowers and repair the hopper, then enclose them in exterior rooms and
protect the spaces with dry sidewall heads from the overhead system.  Has
anyone ever done this?
I walked around and talked to the workers there about how things work, what
does what, etc.; they're still working without the functioning collection
system, not happy about it, but it's work.  They tell me the exhaust
collection system can have anything from small particles from the stitching
machines to larger sheets from when they trim pages.  
Should I just follow the insurers' recommendation, maybe write them a letter
sighting possible standards that apply?  They of course want to spend no
money on sprinklers even though they had a fire.
"How much for a couple of heads?" was the first thing the owner said to me.
TD


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to