No - unless the AHJ just decides he wants it (rare)...that is my
EXPERIENCE, not a technical interpretation by a member of a committee, etc.
Greg

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]>wrote:

> Okay, this is ironic.   California Seismic Guy has a question about
> non-seismic applications.
>
> I'm sitting in a meeting in Big Spring Texas where a VA Hospital retrofit
> is to be undertaken and where the building is not required to be
> seismically protected.   Do the clearance provisions of 9.3.4 apply if the
> buildings not rated for seismic?   The section makes requirements in
> general terms, which could be interpreted as unilateral prescriptives, but
> is in a chapter about protection of piping against earthquakes (obviously).
>
> The end game on this one is that we don't want to cut large holes in fire
> rated walls and can't install flex couplings within a foot of each side.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve L.
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: winmail.dat
> Type: application/ms-tnef
> Size: 3846 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20111129/110ef83b/attachment.bin
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>



-- 
Greg McGahan
Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com>
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
fax 850-937-1852
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20111129/b324ad3b/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to