Good to see so many "qualified" individuals out there putting out such quality work.............
Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 CH2MHILL Extension 74102 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Williams Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 9:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Occupancy Classification And I just got a set of plans and specs this morning calling for 0.16/1500 in the OH areas. "Let's do the Time Warp again!" At 08:59 PM 3/13/2012, you wrote: >You weren't drinking enough back then Roland. I remember six curves for OH. > >On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Dale Wingard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, I started in '85 so I used them for awhile. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:20 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Occupancy Classification >> >> Good call. I'd forgotten, I started in 95 so I never used the old >> densities >> except for times like this. >> >> Bob Knight, CET III >> 208-318-3057 >> www.firebyknight.com >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dale Wingard [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:14 PM >> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' >> Subject: RE: Occupancy Classification >> >> If you go back to the '89 edition of 13 you will find that .16/1500 was the >> density of Ord Gp I. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:06 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Occupancy Classification >> >> It's more like a kitchen, and as far as the .16, that's what the only >> available sprinkler plans show the existing density to be. I don't know >> where it was derived from. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Bob Knight, CET III >> 208-318-3057 >> www.firebyknight.com >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:59 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Occupancy Classification >> >> I'd be hesitant on assigning a classification on something like that >> without >> more info OR you pick a classification based on what you know and >> extensively qualify it on your design documents. If they are testing for >> taste I'd assume they are cooking, are they baking, frying, boiling or >> ?????????? Is it more like a kitchen than a "lab" with areas similar to a >> greenhouse? >> >> .16 where did that come from? >> >> Craig L. Prahl, CET >> Fire Protection >> CH2MHILL >> Lockwood Greene >> 1500 International Drive >> Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 >> Direct - 864.599.4102 >> Fax - 864.599.8439 >> CH2MHILL Extension 74102 >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:55 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Occupancy Classification >> >> I don't have much in the way of additional info, but they pot and incubate >> potato plants and dehydrate the potatoes as well. The only available >> sprinkler info on the existing system is a that the original system was >> calculated with a .16 / 1500. No additional info beyond this. >> >> Bob Knight, CET III >> 208-318-3057 >> www.firebyknight.com >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 1:51 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Occupancy Classification >> >> Is it just taste testing? Do you have any specific information on the >> processes involved? >> >> Craig L. Prahl, CET >> Fire Protection >> CH2MHILL >> Lockwood Greene >> 1500 International Drive >> Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 >> Direct - 864.599.4102 >> Fax - 864.599.8439 >> CH2MHILL Extension 74102 >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:39 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Occupancy Classification >> >> I have a facility that tests potatoes for flavor, texture, etc... This >> particular use will be inside an existing facility where they are adding >> walls and a mezzanine to create two small labs. Neither level will be over >> 1,100 sf with 8'6" ceilings. I'm thinking that it needs to be classified >> as OH 1 having a similar function as to a "Dairy products manufacturing and >> processing" facility. This is based on the Annex of NFPA 13, 2010 ed., >> A.5.3.1. Would anyone think that this should be classified differently? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Bob Knight, CET III >> 208-318-3057 >> www.firebyknight.com >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4868 - Release Date: 03/13/12 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4868 - Release Date: 03/13/12 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4868 - Release Date: 03/13/12 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> > > > >-- >Ron Greenman >Instructor >Fire Protection Engineering Technology >Bates Technical College >1101 So. Yakima Ave. >Tacoma, WA 98405 > >[email protected] > >http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/ > >253.680.7346 >253.576.9700 (cell) > >Member: >ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC > >They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon, >essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626) >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120313/c22a86e4/attachment.html> >_______________________________________________ >Sprinklerforum mailing list >[email protected] >http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum Todd G. Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT 860.535.2080 www.fpdc.com _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
