I'd like to see that section.  Barring a correction from a section that 
actually says that if you are talking about trade-ups the IBC says you can 
lower 1 hour requirements to 0.  It does not say 0 will achieve 1 hour when 
sprinklered.  Especially when in a LH you only need 30 minutes of water.  Yes, 
yes there are very few buildings with rating requirements and no OH.   But I 
have seen a few gov't buildings where the LH was the driving force on water 
because no room design method and you can pack a lot of sprinkler in the 
bathroom/locker/hallway cluster.  Last one was 27 or 28 heads in a 3,000 sq.ft. 
LH design.  

Again, I don't know everything show me your cards if you got them. 

Chris Cahill, PE*
Senior Fire Protection Engineer, Aviation & Facilities Group
Burns & McDonnell
8201 Norman Center Drive
Bloomington, MN 55437
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]
www.burnsmcd.com

Proud to be one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For
*Registered in: MN





-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad Casterline
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 4:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: glass block floor - 1hr rating

There is a section in IBC that, given materials with no fire resistive ratings 
what so ever, just by sprinklering the building gives them a one hour 
resistance--- that may be something one could hang their hat on, But, there can 
no area or height increases taken ALSO. (increased travel dist. is still ok).

-----Original Message-----
From: Cahill, Christopher [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 4:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: glass block floor - 1hr rating

I think no way is a little strong.  If it's kept wet on the bottom side it will 
not fail.  i.e. Window sprinklers are two hours more because they stopped the 
test.  Data at that point was flat temperatures.  Would have
lasted longer.   Pony wall was because they did get some failing or at least
fear of failing  when the fire was pushed up right against the glass (see next 
paragraph) and break occurred before the sprinkler operated?  We also know once 
sprinklers operate the plume temperature go way down even when not putting out 
the fire.  Now how are you going to keep it wet is a fair
question.  Especially the points between 4 sprinklers.   

But here's another interesting caveat.  I believe all the rated testing is from 
a fire below.  Wonder what the glass will do with the fire on top?  I think 
it's hard to argue the spot right under the fire is going to get wet.
But again other forms of construction aren't tested from above so it might not 
be fair to test this one. 

Would I put my PE on the line? Probably not, especially for an architect.
Not to slam them but I'm not going that far out for others just for a unique
design.  Looks cool <> my PE.   But that's a risk tolerance question, not a
physics question.  I bet though you will find a lot more PE's than AHJ's that 
would put their name on it even though the AHJ has limited or no liability.  
And I bet none of either group are on this forum.  

Chris Cahill, PE*
Senior Fire Protection Engineer, Aviation & Facilities Group Burns & McDonnell
8201 Norman Center Drive
Bloomington, MN 55437
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]
www.burnsmcd.com

Proud to be one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For *Registered in: MN





-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 4:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: glass block floor - 1hr rating

That may be the case but there's no way to substantiate such an equivalency.
But hey if someone likes sticking their neck on the chopping block, so be it.

Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad
Casterline
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: glass block floor - 1hr rating

I am aware of a similar situation where the AHJ accepted the use of Old
Style Heads (spray 40% up/60% down) AND bump the occupancy classification
from Light Hazard to Ordinary Hazard Group I.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dewayne Martinez [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:48 PM
To: SprinklerFORUM
Subject: glass block floor - 1hr rating

Have a building where the architect wants to install a glass block floor
in lieu of an atrium opening but the floor needs to have a 1 hr rating.
Is there anywhere in the IBC/IFC/NFPA code that allows sprinkler
protection to provide the 1hr rating?

Thanks,

 

Dewayne Martinez

Design Build Fire Protection

262-784-7900 (w)

262-784-8401 (f)

414-349-0468 (cell)

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachment
s/20120412/eecaefc5/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to