Aren't you supposed to replace with new heads if the old ones are unscrewed?

Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
www.fpdc.com

On Feb 28, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Ron Greenman <[email protected]> wrote:

> And perhaps you let it go since the change of heads is for remediation of
> another problem, and so that that remediation does not cause another
> problem. When talking about the changes in demand basis calcs the heads are
> the same, only the numbers have been changed to be more conservative. As
> good as it would be to update calcs and upgrade the system if necessary,
> that might be an onerous requirement. reusing the old heads though is a
> different matter as we've found that taking heads out and replacing often
> causes damage to the heads from over-stressing.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:54 AM, John O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The facility was a high-rise residential occupancy, designed to NFPA-13.
>> Heads were QR semi-recessed chrome pend, K=5.6, ½" orifice, 155°.  We
>> replaced with same, but used 286° for a week or two until remediation was
>> complete.  No design change at all, only downside to entire project would
>> have been a short time delay to fuse temperature should a fire occur in the
>> interim.
>> John O'Connor
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cahill,
>> Christopher
>> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 9:54 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Bedbugs
>> 
>> How do you replace heads based on a minimum density that no longer exists?
>> Speaking of the residential heads before the 0.05 minimum of today?  Sounds
>> like a few nightmares having to re-calc and replace piping in some
>> circumstances?
>> 
>> Chris Cahill, PE*
>> Senior Fire Protection Engineer, Aviation & Facilities Group Burns &
>> McDonnell
>> 8201 Norman Center Drive
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to