It seems Nebraskans are about as important as Kansans.
I heard a former FM say once "I'm not going to tell some rancher out in the
Sandhills he can't build a new home without sprinklers"
I can't image why anyone (with some common sense) would build a new home
without sprinklers. But, then again I KNOW the benefits of such.


David Autry

Meininger Fire Protection Inc.
2521 W L St. Suite No.4
Lincoln, Ne 68522
Voice (402) 466-2616
Fax (402) 466-2617
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank
Herrick
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 4:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Home Fire Sprinkler Guidance - New Jersey

My heartfelt congratulations to everyone in New Jersey who made this happen,
you have saved lives !

That’s a thousand times better than what's happed here in Kansas. Code
official have been cut off at the knees thanks to the combined efforts of
the HBA and the Realtor's Association. Local city and county cannot require
sprinklers in single family housing

I guess that the citizens of New jersey are more important than people in
Kansas and deserve the protection of a residential fire sprinkler system. As
a fire service professional and a paramedic with over 25 years of experience
I can tell you exactly what will happen in a home without fire sprinklers.

Furthermore, I can tell you that the two most likely places these residents
will relocate to:  The Burn Center or The Morgue.

Here is the Kansas law that will be responsible for the deaths and injuries
to numerous Men, Women, Children and the elderly, and who knows how many
firefighters:

Kansas Statute 12-16,219. Cities, counties; prohibition on fire sprinkler
requirements in certain residential dwellings.

(a) As used in this section:

(1) "Municipality" means any city or county.

(2) "Residential structure" means any improvement to real property to be
used or occupied as a single-family dwelling or multi-family dwelling of two
attached living units or less or any manufactured home.

(b)  No municipality shall adopt or enforce any ordinance, order, code,
standard or rule requiring the installation of a multi-purpose residential
fire protection sprinkler system or any other fire sprinkler protection
system in any residential structure. Nothing in this section shall prohibit
any person from voluntarily installing a multi-purpose residential fire
protection sprinkler system or any other fire sprinkler protection system in
a residential structure.

(c)  No municipality shall require the installation of a multi-purpose
residential fire protection sprinkler system in any residential structure as
a condition for consideration or approval of any building permit or plat.

History: L. 2010, ch. 116, § 25;  L. 2011, ch. 43, § 1;  Apr. 14.

Very sorrowfully yours,

Capt. Frank J. Herrick

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to