A perfect example on getting an accurate assignment on the commodity as a first 
step.  Hard to argue with Larry on this stuff but after sitting on NFPA 13 with 
him for 20 years. one has to try occasionally.

Roland

Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
Dallas, TX
http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/>





> On Nov 11, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Larry Keeping <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I've been watching this thread and though that I'd put my oar in.
> 
> The message that started the conversation referenced storage of PVC to a 
> height of 8 ft. As per the examples in Table A.5.6.3 and Table A.5.6.3.3, PVC 
> can be considered a Class III commoditiy (There might be an exception if it 
> is highly plasticized, there used to be but I can't find it today). However, 
> with the Class III designation to less than 12 ft storage it could be 
> protected per Table 13.2.1 via the OH2 curve  of Figure 13.2.1.
> 
> The 40000 sq ft system size requirement is for Section 8.2.1(3) extra hazard 
> and for Section 8.2.1(4) high piled storage, so it wouldn't apply to this 
> scenario. (In the new 2016 edition that would be identified as "low piled 
> storage".)
> 
> Section 13.2.2 permits installation by NFPA 13 and design criteria and 
> modifiers as ... Chapter 11 for ordinary hazard ...
> So that  should throw you back to Section 8.2.1(2). Therefore a system size 
> of 52000 sq ft would be acceptable, even if the whole facility was used for 
> that storage configuration.
> 
> Larry Keeping

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to