At my last stop we worked for a single owner with a couple big sites and 
deep pockets.  We ended up coordinating every annual test with the 
electricians so they could do the readings.  The owner budgeted for and 
replaced the pump controllers over a couple year period so they all had 
external readouts for that info.  Unfortunately many owners aren't so well 
off, and for most sprinklers are on the list down around bathroom fixtures 
for things they want to mess with.



Mike Morey
CFPS 3229 • NICET S.E.T. 123677
Project Manager • Fire Protection Group
Shambaugh & Son, LP an EMCOR Company
7614 Opportunity Drive • Fort Wayne, IN • 46825
direct 260.487.7824 /  cell 260.417.0625 /  fax 260.487.7991
email [email protected]







From:   Jay Stough <[email protected]>
To:     Sprinkler Forum <[email protected]>
Date:   03/28/2017 07:02 AM
Subject:        Re: Another NFPA 25 Question - Controllers
Sent by:        "Sprinklerforum" 
<[email protected]>



A few years ago we changed our procedure so that if the controller does 
not have a digital read out of amps and volts, we would not provide it.  
We will not open controllers; not worth the risk.  We have told owners and 
their insurance companies that we would be happy to provide a qualified 
electrician on a T & M basis if those numbers are required.  No one has 
taken us up on it in the past 3 or 4 years.  

Jay Stough 
NICET IV LAYOUT 
NICET III ITM

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Bruce Verhei <[email protected]> wrote:
As a municipal fire inspector I always made sure I stood well back when 
the controller door was open. Flash burns are ugly. It's not like getting 
a simple broken arm or something. 

But I'm usually witnessing acceptance test. 

Most annual tests do include amps on each leg. 

Some have lead this discussion away from what is code towards how should 
this be addressed. This is good in this case. 

I'd bet few NFPA 25 inspectors are NFPA 70E whizzes.

Diesel controllers. Not the same at all.

Best

Bruce Verhei 

On Mar 27, 2017, at 09:14, John Irwin <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Great answer.
 
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager – Fire Sprinklers
Critical System Solutions, LLC
Licence Number: FPC16-000053
Cell:     813.618.2781
Email:  [email protected]
 
<image003.png>
 
From: Sprinklerforum [
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy 
Blocker
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 12:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Another NFPA 25 Question - Controllers
 
The only ones we do in house are diesel drivers.  This decision was only 
made when the insurance agent explained everything we would need to do to 
cover our rear.  Also we found out that local licensing requires a master 
electrician be the one to touch high voltage.  So the scenario presented 
to us was that my inspector is hurt by electrical equipment. The attorneys 
would as for his license as an electrician, copies of his safety training 
that we provided. If we couldn't show all this we were a sitting duck in 
court.  
JJ
Sent from my iPhone 6 

On Mar 27, 2017, at 9:52 AM, John Irwin <
[email protected]> wrote:
You say 440 volt … So you do the 208v yourself?
 
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager – Fire Sprinklers
Critical System Solutions, LLC
Licence Number: FPC16-000053
Cell:     813.618.2781
Email:  [email protected]
 
<image003.png>
 
From: Sprinklerforum [
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy 
Blocker
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 11:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Another NFPA 25 Question - Controllers
 
The easiest solution we found when faced with this very problem was to 
call in the experts.  When we asked our insurance agent about this we 
discovered that we could end up needing to change our policy to cover high 
voltage exposure.   So we now use manufacturers recommended pump service 
companies to perform the test.   This not only keeps us away from the 440 
volt 3 phase power but it also allows the specialist to find issues that 
the average sprinkler inspector would not notice.  Our reports are 
carrying more weight now as well since a P.E. signs the pump report. 
JJ
Sent from my iPhone 6 

On Mar 27, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Matthew J Willis <[email protected]> 
wrote:
IS voltage a required item on the report? Along with amps?
 
I always had the PPE and shook hands within..
 
R/
Matt
 
Matthew J. Willis
Project Manager
Rapid Fire Protection Inc.
1530 Samco Road
Rapid City, SD 57702
Office-605.348.2342
Direct Line-605.593.5063
Cell-605.391.2733
Fax:-605.348.0108
 
<image001.png>
 
From: Sprinklerforum [
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland 
Huggins
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 9:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Another NFPA 25 Question - Controllers
 
There is a TIA to NFPA 25 effectively saying stay the hell out of it.  
We’ll see where it goes but it makes sense considering the hazard.  What 
do our pump inspectors herein think?
 
Roland
 
 
Roland Huggins, PE - Senior VP Engineering
American Fire Sprinkler Assn.    
Dallas, TX
http://www.firesprinkler.org
 
Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
 
 
 
On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:32 AM, John Denhardt <[email protected]> 
wrote:
 
My personal opinion - no. 

John August Denhardt, P.E.
Strickland Fire Protection 

On Mar 27, 2017, at 6:34 AM, John Irwin <
[email protected]> wrote:
What are an inspector’s responsibilities when it comes to opening up a 
fire pump controller? One of our inspector’s wants me to buy him some PPE 
so he can comfortably open up the fire pump controller. I am certainly not 
opposed to this but I have talked to a number of inspectors at other 
companies who say if there isn’t an external meter on the cabinet, the 
voltage isn’t getting recorded. Should sprinkler inspectors even be in the 
cabinet?
 
 
 
 
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager – Fire Sprinklers 
Critical System Solutions, LLC
License Number: FPC16-000053
2830 Scherer Drive, Suite 300
St. Petersburg, FL  33716
Office: 727.209.5122
Fax:      727.209.5126
Cell:     813.618.2781
Email:  [email protected]
 
<image003.png>
 
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
<image003.png>_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwICAg&c=GKdB6-XpYq_0W-WluyVHtw&r=z4t2hrRBa-JsS06T4X_uuYOSJoclVWgSRO8Nq6TDdsg&m=rylYpJcyEU-t9FLHBqpQUFV9fCrLCHESKtocMOTT8uU&s=XdkP3ieNwS2viEz2LB33rnY2zFk55UHoTMhHhzst9DI&e=
 




This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege 
is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in 
error, please  immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, 
destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or 
indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message 
if you are not the intended recipient.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to