Brian, Reading through 8.8.5.1.2 I'd have to agree with you that a head would be required under it. My question would be, can you move the head to protect beneath that reveal and use 8.8.7.2 to leave the other area as an unprotected pocket? Not sure of the size of the space you are working with and where these heads would fall within it, but may be something to look at.
Regards, Wayne T. Cordiner Jr. 917-426-5844 [email protected] On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Brian Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > Using extended coverage pendent heads & have a soffit/reveal that is 60” > wide and runs the length of the wall and sticks down 3” from the ACT. The > heads are far enough away from the edge of the soffit/reveal to through > under it and reach the wall no problem. But if I’m reading things right > since this soffit/reveal is along a wall I have to apply either 8.8.5.1.2 > (b/c) NNFPA-13 2013) which would require heads under it as well correct? > Just seems like an overkill to me. > > > > *Brian Harris, CET* > > BVS Systems Inc. > > Design Manager > > bvssystemsinc.com > > Phone: 704.896.9989 <(704)%20896-9989> > > Fax: 704.896.1935 <(704)%20896-1935> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. > org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
