I would take a close look at the reports that your program is generating to 
make sure that everything looks reasonable. With a reputable program, the most 
common errors are input errors (one pipe can accidentally get set to an odd 
size) - although I sometimes see a device or pipe section 'turned off'.

It sounds like you are only talking about a 10% ish difference in flow, so that 
sounds pretty reasonable. One design could easily flow 10% more than another.

Try this - look at the sections of pipe that are carrying the total flow. Then 
check the pressure loss per foot and see what the difference is.

For example: if you are using 4" main it would take about 350' of main to 
account for this pressure change (1168 gpm in 4" = .367 psi/ft; 1027 = 
.289psi/ft). The difference is .08 psi/ft. over 350' - that adds up to 27psi.

Smaller pipe will add up even faster. That is a pretty rough way to figure it, 
but it will let you know if you are in the right ballpark. [numbers above 
include generous rounding]

Matt


From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 7:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Is this remotely possible ??

I have a calculation for a dry system that is currently -2.945 psi (-19.8%) 
over the curve. My most demanding head is one of (2) heads on a 1" arm-over, if 
I change the section of pipe (7'-6" long) that feeds this head to 1-1/4" my 
calc changes to +24.168 psi (136.8%) under the curve. Seems fishy to me, 
thoughts?

Brian Harris, CET
BVS Systems Inc.
Design Manager
bvssystemsinc.com<http://bvssystemsinc.com/>
Phone: 704.896.9989
Fax: 704.896.1935

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to