I suppose you might develop a hole in the fill line over time. It is frequently 
wet and then dry-ish with plenty of air venting. Sounds rusty…

Like when you get a hole in your Big-Gulp straw. That will entrain air in your 
iced tea.

Matt


From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Mike B Morey
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Suction Tank Question

Maybe this is a dumb question, but much like the return line for a relief, if 
the fill line is piped below the lowest level of water after system demand is 
satisfied, is there any way air could become entrapped?  Other than maybe some 
splashing?

________________________________

Mike Morey
CFPS 3229 • NICET S.E.T. 123677
Project Manager • Fire Protection Group
Shambaugh & Son, LP an EMCOR Company
7614 Opportunity Drive • Fort Wayne, IN • 46825
direct 260.487.7824 /  cell 260.417.0625 /  fax 260.487.7991
email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

[cid:[email protected]]





From:        "Mark Sornsin [FAR]" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To:        "'[email protected]'" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date:        02/28/2019 03:25 PM
Subject:        RE: Suction Tank Question
Sent by:        "Sprinklerforum" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
________________________________



BE ADVISED - This email originated outside EMCOR.

IMHO the intent of the rule is to get the inlet away from the suction so as to 
minimize the potential for air entrainment, as has been discussed. As written 
the inlet needs to be on the opposite half of the tank. This could mean a ½ 
diameter away, or maybe at least 90 degrees along the outside of a round tank 
from the pump suction nozzle.

Could it be located closer to the suction without causing problems – probably, 
especially on a 90 ft. diameter tank, but that is not how the standard is 
written.  Perhaps it may be time for a suggested improvement to be sent to the 
NFPA 22 committee.  Remember also that the fill line for a 90 ft. diameter tank 
is likely going to be much larger than one for a 20 ft. diameter tank, which 
makes a difference as well.

-Mark

Note: None of the above should be interpreted as an official opinion or 
position of the NFPA 22 technical committee.

[Visit our Website at 
www.SummitCoUS.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.SummitCoUS.com&d=DwMGaQ&c=GKdB6-XpYq_0W-WluyVHtw&r=z4t2hrRBa-JsS06T4X_uuYOSJoclVWgSRO8Nq6TDdsg&m=ScOwpnIuDgO9vQxhFnt8NAFUF35YZwhJfHxFW7l5qMc&s=vz75yNupl9avU1zvJ0ye_f6ZbOAmiY8xk5ggg0aSVhA&e=>

Mark Sornsin
Sr. Fire Protection Engineer
Direct: 701-499-1391
Cell: 701-526-8585



From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 9:42 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Suction Tank Question

NFPA 22 states the following:

14.4.10.1 Pipes for the automatic filling of suction tanks shall discharge into 
the opposite half of the tanks from the pump suction pipe.

Does that mean that the fill line has to be directly across (opposite) the tank 
from the pump suction? If I’ve got a tank with a diameter of 90 feet, do I 
really need to run the fill line all the way around to the other side or is 
there an acceptable minimum distance? It seems like overkill to require the 
fill line to be 90 feet away from the suction. I mean, if it was a small tank 
with a diameter of 20 feet, then only 20 feet away would be acceptable, right?

Any thoughts?

Kyle Montgomery
 [cid:[email protected]]
Aero Automatic Sprinkler Co.
21605 N. Central Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Direct: 623.580.7820
Cell: 602.763.4736
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit 
http://www.symanteccloud.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.symanteccloud.com&d=DwMGaQ&c=GKdB6-XpYq_0W-WluyVHtw&r=z4t2hrRBa-JsS06T4X_uuYOSJoclVWgSRO8Nq6TDdsg&m=ScOwpnIuDgO9vQxhFnt8NAFUF35YZwhJfHxFW7l5qMc&s=2rcw7xsNl2jyZDJYj3o1M6RME-v3PByDlInY3QsRzUo&e=>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwICAg&c=GKdB6-XpYq_0W-WluyVHtw&r=z4t2hrRBa-JsS06T4X_uuYOSJoclVWgSRO8Nq6TDdsg&m=ScOwpnIuDgO9vQxhFnt8NAFUF35YZwhJfHxFW7l5qMc&s=6mtEAnUdIJNpwSWVvLVsznuORSZW4baIahOW7knDNms&e=
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, 
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege 
is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, 
please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any 
hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, 
use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are 
not the intended recipient.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to