the problem its that for making some noise or request users must register, send email, waith response aproval.. too complicated processs.. that's the reason Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
2017-06-07 2:16 GMT-04:00 Daniel Kamil Kozar <dkk...@gmail.com>: > Patches are still welcome, I guess. I haven't seen anybody claiming > that this would be done in any way. > > On 6 June 2017 at 15:17, PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> how its the status of this work? >> >> a limited implementation will be good! >> >> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) >> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com >> >> 2017-03-15 12:24 GMT-04:00 Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>: >> >>> >>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 4:09pm, Dominique Devienne <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:57 PM, R Smith <rsm...@rsweb.co.za> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I wonder, sqlite Devs, if a pragma or other adaption (such as the >>> current >>> >> pragma table_info()) or such could produce the same exact data but with >>> an >>> >> added field called "Comment" that simply gives the parsed comment from >>> >> after each column definition (if any) like the above table example. This >>> >> would probably be a very small adaptation, be completely backwards >>> >> compatible, doesn't break any standard (since there isn't any) and >>> answer >>> >> the need expressed by this thread and others before it. >>> > >>> > That's one way to solve it, in a mostly BC (Backward Compatible) way. >>> > (modulo the output from table_info() changing, which could be opt-in to >>> > make it fully BC). >>> >>> Problem is, it requires parsing the CREATE command looking for comments in >>> a certain format. Notoriously difficult, considering that they can contain >>> CR, LF, tab, and unforeseen Unicode characters. >>> >>> I’m utterly against anything that tries to read C-style comments. >>> Comments are comments. Computers are meant to ignore them to the point >>> that they don’t even know they exist. >>> >>> On the other hand, if we establish a standard for storing comments in >>> database tables — which would require a consistent table name, column >>> names, and values — it might take too much extra time to show those >>> comments as an extra column in the response to PRAGMA tale_info() and >>> similar PRAGMAs. But I think it’s overkill. Anyone who would want that >>> would know how to retrieve the information. >>> >>> Simon. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sqlite-users mailing list >>> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org >>> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org >> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
