On 11/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All of the arguments against my proposed changes are > basically of the form that "this is not what the SQL standard > says". They are theoretical arguments based on a world-view > that holds that strong-typing is good and that it is the duty > of database systems to enforce types. > > I do not hold to that world view. SQLite seeks a better way.
I think it's a bit misleading to call the library "SQL-Lite: if you're going to redesign and not be like SQL. What do you think about creating a separate project for a fast light database engine that's not "SQL Like"?
