> > I think it's a bit misleading to call the library "SQL-Lite: if you're > > going to redesign > > and not be like SQL. What do you think about creating a separate > > project for a fast > > light database engine that's not "SQL Like"? > > SQLite is very much SQL. It only deviates from the standard > to fix bugs in the original design of the standard.
If you're going to become less compliant perhaps it would be less misleading to remove the "SQL" from the project name. I'm not saying either is a bad idea, just that the name shouldn't be misleading.
