Jens Alfke, on Tuesday, October 8, 2019 12:06 PM, wrote... > > > > On Oct 8, 2019, at 5:34 AM, Jose Isaias Cabrera, on > > > > No, that is not what I was trying to say or ask. Not even close. What I was > trying to say, and most of you missed it was, that if I give date a date > format, > and I also provide the format of how that date is to be understood, ie.... > > Sorry for misunderstanding. But I think this goes against SQLite’s design > goal of > simplicity. Date-time formatting is complicated, so this would add measurably > to > the library’s footprint*, which would be a problem for using it in embedded > systems, which would require yet another compile-time configuration flag to > enable/disable it, which would complicate testing... etc.
I agree. > I think the idea of a semi-official ”SQLite++” has been floated here before: a > distro with lots of extensions and a more powerful CLI. I like that idea. That would be something! josé _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
