On 02/21/2010 08:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 20:18 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: >> On 02/21/2010 06:10 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: >>> sön 2010-02-21 klockan 17:10 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov: >>> >>>> The only inter-process cooperation I plan to support initially is "N >>>> processes monitoring the same http_port (and doing everything else)". >>> I guess there will be no shared cache then? >> Not initially, but that is the second step goal. > > I suggest using CARP then, to route to backends.
In the initial implementation, there are no backends. You get N processes that do the same thing, including listening on the same http_port. Whether it would be more efficient to do CARP or a "distributed" but cache shared among the same squidN processes is an open question for the second step. I would not be surprised if the answer depends on the traffic/environment. Alex.
