Jan Janak wrote: > > Also, what is the real difference between using sip;transport=tls and > sips in Route headers? In both cases the server sending the request > will fail to deliver it if it cannot contact the downstream server > over TLS. Or is it supposed to fallback to UDP when the parameter is > used and reject the request when sips is used?
I think the upshot of it all is that there is no more transport=tls. If you want TLS, you have to do use the sips scheme with transport=tcp; if you want DTLS, you do sips with transport=udp. This is somewhat consistent with SRV, where for SIP over TLS you would use the prefix _sips._tcp. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
