Am 05.07.2011 18:42, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo: > NOTE: In fact, some existing clients (as the widely extended PJSIP) > would fail if the Record-Route contains sips+transport=tcp as I've > reported today: > http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2011-July/013102.html > > This is because PJSIP does not understand at all the meaning of a sips > schema (ugly in a so widely deployed SIP stack).
Maybe pjsip is the only one who make it right. ;-) IMO "sips:" is totally broken and should be deprecated. With "sips:" a client relies that all intermediate hops are standard conform and do forwarding with encryption. If you really need encryption end2end this is a wrong approach - so it is broken by design. regards Klaus _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
