6 jul 2011 kl. 10.09 skrev Klaus Darilion: > > > Am 05.07.2011 18:42, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo: >> NOTE: In fact, some existing clients (as the widely extended PJSIP) >> would fail if the Record-Route contains sips+transport=tcp as I've >> reported today: >> http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2011-July/013102.html >> >> This is because PJSIP does not understand at all the meaning of a sips >> schema (ugly in a so widely deployed SIP stack). > > Maybe pjsip is the only one who make it right. ;-) > > IMO "sips:" is totally broken and should be deprecated. With "sips:" a > client relies that all intermediate hops are standard conform and do > forwarding with encryption. If you really need encryption end2end this > is a wrong approach - so it is broken by design. > Yes. SIPS: doesn't really help anyone and showing a padlock on the phone is a broken model here.
/O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
