Am 05.07.2011 19:04, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo: > 2011/7/5 Jan Janak <[email protected]>: >> > So what is the difference then? How is a Route header with sips scheme >> > different from a Route header with the transport=tls parameter? Is the >> > proxy server supposed to treat Route headers with sips differently >> > than Route headers with sip;transport=tls? > No, the only difference is that transport=tls is deprecated and > """"maybe"""" some devices don't understand ;transport=tls.
I just wonder why it is deprecated at all? IIRC "sips:" does not mandate any protocol, just that encryption must be used. Thus, plain TCP over IPsec would also fulfill "sips:", but for sure is different than TLS+TCP. regards Klaus _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
