On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]> wrote: >>> - nathelper - some extra functionality, not sure if can be kept >>> completely >> >> Maybe Andreas can look into this, as there is a lot of work going on with >> nathelper and the new rtpproxy anyways. > > I think Ovidiu Sas looked at it when he split the rtpproxy out in a > dedicated module.
IIRC, ping_contact whas the extra functionality in nathelper: http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_s/nathelper/nathelper.html#ping_contact I don't know how widely used is this functionality. Maybe we should have a separate thread per module (in user mailing list to gather more imput) and see if it's worth merging the code or use only the k version. Also, on a separate note, I saw the we have a few db2_[module]. I think it would make sense for these modules to rename them into [module]_db[1|2]. For example: ldap - we should have both versions under modules: - ldap_db1 - ldap_db2 Just a suggestion ... -ovidiu _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
