20 dec 2012 kl. 17:20 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]>:
> > On 12/20/12 5:16 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> 20 dec 2012 kl. 16:13 skrev Ovidiu Sas <[email protected]>: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> - nathelper - some extra functionality, not sure if can be kept >>>>>> completely >>>>> Maybe Andreas can look into this, as there is a lot of work going on with >>>>> nathelper and the new rtpproxy anyways. >>>> I think Ovidiu Sas looked at it when he split the rtpproxy out in a >>>> dedicated module. >>> IIRC, ping_contact whas the extra functionality in nathelper: >>> http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_s/nathelper/nathelper.html#ping_contact >>> I don't know how widely used is this functionality. >>> >>> Maybe we should have a separate thread per module (in user mailing >>> list to gather more imput) and see if it's worth merging the code or >>> use only the k version. >>> >>> >>> Also, on a separate note, I saw the we have a few db2_[module]. >>> I think it would make sense for these modules to rename them into >>> [module]_db[1|2]. >>> For example: ldap - we should have both versions under modules: >>> - ldap_db1 >>> - ldap_db2 >>> Just a suggestion ... >> What's the difference between the db1 and db2 interface? > It is not the case here, modules_k/ldap does not have any relation to > database interface. Well, I changed the issue then - I'm curious on the difference... /O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
