On 12/20/12 5:16 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
20 dec 2012 kl. 16:13 skrev Ovidiu Sas <[email protected]>:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<[email protected]> wrote:
- nathelper - some extra functionality, not sure if can be kept
completely
Maybe Andreas can look into this, as there is a lot of work going on with
nathelper and the new rtpproxy anyways.
I think Ovidiu Sas looked at it when he split the rtpproxy out in a
dedicated module.
IIRC, ping_contact whas the extra functionality in nathelper:
http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_s/nathelper/nathelper.html#ping_contact
I don't know how widely used is this functionality.
Maybe we should have a separate thread per module (in user mailing
list to gather more imput) and see if it's worth merging the code or
use only the k version.
Also, on a separate note, I saw the we have a few db2_[module].
I think it would make sense for these modules to rename them into
[module]_db[1|2].
For example: ldap - we should have both versions under modules:
- ldap_db1
- ldap_db2
Just a suggestion ...
What's the difference between the db1 and db2 interface?
It is not the case here, modules_k/ldap does not have any relation to
database interface.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
