20 dec 2012 kl. 16:13 skrev Ovidiu Sas <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> - nathelper - some extra functionality, not sure if can be kept >>>> completely >>> >>> Maybe Andreas can look into this, as there is a lot of work going on with >>> nathelper and the new rtpproxy anyways. >> >> I think Ovidiu Sas looked at it when he split the rtpproxy out in a >> dedicated module. > > IIRC, ping_contact whas the extra functionality in nathelper: > http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_s/nathelper/nathelper.html#ping_contact > I don't know how widely used is this functionality. > > Maybe we should have a separate thread per module (in user mailing > list to gather more imput) and see if it's worth merging the code or > use only the k version. > > > Also, on a separate note, I saw the we have a few db2_[module]. > I think it would make sense for these modules to rename them into > [module]_db[1|2]. > For example: ldap - we should have both versions under modules: > - ldap_db1 > - ldap_db2 > Just a suggestion ...
What's the difference between the db1 and db2 interface? /O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
