That sounds sensible. 

Sent from mobile, might be terse 

On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:26 PM, "Ashley Ward" <[email protected]> wrote:

> It would be great to keep them consistent, but is it worth potentially
> breaking implementations? I think the main problem with accept was that
> the example was inconsistent with the text.
> 
> In fact, I very much doubt anyone should be using that option as xmpp
> mandates the use of utf-8, and I doubt anyone's using bosh for anything
> other than xmpp. Perhaps we should just look at getting rid of that
> attribute?
> 
> --
> Ash
> 
> On 04/02/2013 10:30, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Cross-posted from the summit list (sorry making noise).
>> Here are my small notes to the BOSH action list (embedded).
>> 
>> 
>> /Steffen
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [Summit] BOSH actions
>>> Date: February 2, 2013 10:18:01 PM GMT+01:00
>>> To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Bidirectional Streams Over Synchronous HTTP <[email protected]>, XMPP
>>> Summit <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> Maybe it would be better to take the technical discussion to the
>>> standards@ list?
>>> 
>>> Sent from mobile, might be terse
>>> 
>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:32 PM, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey,
>>>> 
>>>> Just saw the issue with the accept attribute. How about charset? It is
>>>> currently space separated in the example  (and it also says) - but
>>>> should we not comma separate that like the accept attribute?
>>>> 
>>>> Its on 7.2 in http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html:
>>>>  charsets='ISO_8859-1 ISO-2022-JP'
>>>> -Just my 50 cent
>>>> 
>>>> /Steffen
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Winfried Tilanus <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I updated the BOSH issues page with the results & and who will be
>>>>> writing patches.
>>>>> http://wiki.xmpp.org:12480/web/BoshIssues
>>>>> 
>>>>> I only forgot who will be writing the patch for the first issue
>>>>> (remove
>>>>> Pipelining). Plz check if your name pops up at the correct places and
>>>>> ping me if there are any problems!
>>>>> 
>>>>> happy patch-writing!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Winfried
> 
> 

Reply via email to