We don't use it in emite either. Also clients which do implement it should fall back gracefully to utf-8 anyway.
-- Ash On 04/02/2013 21:57, "Stefan Strigler" <[email protected]> wrote: >JSJaC doesn't either. And at least the old implementation of ejabberd's >mod_http_bind didn't as well. > >.Steve > >Am 04.02.2013 um 22:39 schrieb Steffen Larsen <[email protected]>: > >> Just checked strophe, and it does not use it. I'll check some more >>implementations that uses BOSH for transport. Maybe that would give us >>an indication. >> >> /Steffen >> >> On Feb 4, 2013, at 10:06 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" >><[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That sounds sensible. >>> >>> Sent from mobile, might be terse >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:26 PM, "Ashley Ward" <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> It would be great to keep them consistent, but is it worth potentially >>>> breaking implementations? I think the main problem with accept was >>>>that >>>> the example was inconsistent with the text. >>>> >>>> In fact, I very much doubt anyone should be using that option as xmpp >>>> mandates the use of utf-8, and I doubt anyone's using bosh for >>>>anything >>>> other than xmpp. Perhaps we should just look at getting rid of that >>>> attribute? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ash >>>> >>>> On 04/02/2013 10:30, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Cross-posted from the summit list (sorry making noise). >>>>> Here are my small notes to the BOSH action list (embedded). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /Steffen >>>>> >>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>> >>>>>> From: "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Summit] BOSH actions >>>>>> Date: February 2, 2013 10:18:01 PM GMT+01:00 >>>>>> To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>> Cc: Bidirectional Streams Over Synchronous HTTP <[email protected]>, >>>>>>XMPP >>>>>> Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>> Reply-To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe it would be better to take the technical discussion to the >>>>>> standards@ list? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from mobile, might be terse >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:32 PM, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just saw the issue with the accept attribute. How about charset? >>>>>>>It is >>>>>>> currently space separated in the example (and it also says) - but >>>>>>> should we not comma separate that like the accept attribute? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Its on 7.2 in http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html: >>>>>>> charsets='ISO_8859-1 ISO-2022-JP' >>>>>>> -Just my 50 cent >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Steffen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Winfried Tilanus <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I updated the BOSH issues page with the results & and who will be >>>>>>>> writing patches. >>>>>>>> http://wiki.xmpp.org:12480/web/BoshIssues >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I only forgot who will be writing the patch for the first issue >>>>>>>> (remove >>>>>>>> Pipelining). Plz check if your name pops up at the correct places >>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>> ping me if there are any problems! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> happy patch-writing! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Winfried >>>> >>>> >> >
