As I recall this was added to support really ok browsers. Sent from mobile, might be terse
On Feb 5, 2013, at 4:27 AM, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> wrote: > True true, > Ive been looking on some other client implementations as well, and they do > not implements it as well. So I think it seems sane to remove it. > > /Steffen > > On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Ashley Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We don't use it in emite either. >> >> Also clients which do implement it should fall back gracefully to utf-8 >> anyway. >> >> -- >> Ash >> >> On 04/02/2013 21:57, "Stefan Strigler" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> JSJaC doesn't either. And at least the old implementation of ejabberd's >>> mod_http_bind didn't as well. >>> >>> .Steve >>> >>> Am 04.02.2013 um 22:39 schrieb Steffen Larsen <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Just checked strophe, and it does not use it. I'll check some more >>>> implementations that uses BOSH for transport. Maybe that would give us >>>> an indication. >>>> >>>> /Steffen >>>> >>>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 10:06 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That sounds sensible. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from mobile, might be terse >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:26 PM, "Ashley Ward" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It would be great to keep them consistent, but is it worth potentially >>>>>> breaking implementations? I think the main problem with accept was >>>>>> that >>>>>> the example was inconsistent with the text. >>>>>> >>>>>> In fact, I very much doubt anyone should be using that option as xmpp >>>>>> mandates the use of utf-8, and I doubt anyone's using bosh for >>>>>> anything >>>>>> other than xmpp. Perhaps we should just look at getting rid of that >>>>>> attribute? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ash >>>>>> >>>>>> On 04/02/2013 10:30, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Cross-posted from the summit list (sorry making noise). >>>>>>> Here are my small notes to the BOSH action list (embedded). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Steffen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Summit] BOSH actions >>>>>>>> Date: February 2, 2013 10:18:01 PM GMT+01:00 >>>>>>>> To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Cc: Bidirectional Streams Over Synchronous HTTP <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>> XMPP >>>>>>>> Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Reply-To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe it would be better to take the technical discussion to the >>>>>>>> standards@ list? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from mobile, might be terse >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:32 PM, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just saw the issue with the accept attribute. How about charset? >>>>>>>>> It is >>>>>>>>> currently space separated in the example (and it also says) - but >>>>>>>>> should we not comma separate that like the accept attribute? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Its on 7.2 in http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html: >>>>>>>>> charsets='ISO_8859-1 ISO-2022-JP' >>>>>>>>> -Just my 50 cent >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /Steffen >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Winfried Tilanus <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I updated the BOSH issues page with the results & and who will be >>>>>>>>>> writing patches. >>>>>>>>>> http://wiki.xmpp.org:12480/web/BoshIssues >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I only forgot who will be writing the patch for the first issue >>>>>>>>>> (remove >>>>>>>>>> Pipelining). Plz check if your name pops up at the correct places >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> ping me if there are any problems! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> happy patch-writing! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Winfried >
