True true, Ive been looking on some other client implementations as well, and they do not implements it as well. So I think it seems sane to remove it.
/Steffen On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Ashley Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > We don't use it in emite either. > > Also clients which do implement it should fall back gracefully to utf-8 > anyway. > > -- > Ash > > On 04/02/2013 21:57, "Stefan Strigler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> JSJaC doesn't either. And at least the old implementation of ejabberd's >> mod_http_bind didn't as well. >> >> .Steve >> >> Am 04.02.2013 um 22:39 schrieb Steffen Larsen <[email protected]>: >> >>> Just checked strophe, and it does not use it. I'll check some more >>> implementations that uses BOSH for transport. Maybe that would give us >>> an indication. >>> >>> /Steffen >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 10:06 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> That sounds sensible. >>>> >>>> Sent from mobile, might be terse >>>> >>>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:26 PM, "Ashley Ward" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It would be great to keep them consistent, but is it worth potentially >>>>> breaking implementations? I think the main problem with accept was >>>>> that >>>>> the example was inconsistent with the text. >>>>> >>>>> In fact, I very much doubt anyone should be using that option as xmpp >>>>> mandates the use of utf-8, and I doubt anyone's using bosh for >>>>> anything >>>>> other than xmpp. Perhaps we should just look at getting rid of that >>>>> attribute? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ash >>>>> >>>>> On 04/02/2013 10:30, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Cross-posted from the summit list (sorry making noise). >>>>>> Here are my small notes to the BOSH action list (embedded). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> /Steffen >>>>>> >>>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Summit] BOSH actions >>>>>>> Date: February 2, 2013 10:18:01 PM GMT+01:00 >>>>>>> To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Cc: Bidirectional Streams Over Synchronous HTTP <[email protected]>, >>>>>>> XMPP >>>>>>> Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Reply-To: XMPP Summit <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe it would be better to take the technical discussion to the >>>>>>> standards@ list? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from mobile, might be terse >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:32 PM, "Steffen Larsen" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just saw the issue with the accept attribute. How about charset? >>>>>>>> It is >>>>>>>> currently space separated in the example (and it also says) - but >>>>>>>> should we not comma separate that like the accept attribute? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Its on 7.2 in http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html: >>>>>>>> charsets='ISO_8859-1 ISO-2022-JP' >>>>>>>> -Just my 50 cent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /Steffen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Winfried Tilanus <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I updated the BOSH issues page with the results & and who will be >>>>>>>>> writing patches. >>>>>>>>> http://wiki.xmpp.org:12480/web/BoshIssues >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I only forgot who will be writing the patch for the first issue >>>>>>>>> (remove >>>>>>>>> Pipelining). Plz check if your name pops up at the correct places >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> ping me if there are any problems! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> happy patch-writing! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Winfried >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >
