Hi All, Thank you everyone for voting.
We have nine +1 and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes are from *Paul Fremantle *Chintana Wilamuna *Ben Dewey *Drew Baird *Nandana Mihindukulasooriya *Kent Brown *Kamaljit Bath *Scott Golightly *Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar I'll send a mail to incubator general list for approval. Regards, Shankar On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Scott Golightly < [email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:05:20 +0000 > > > > +1 for M1 release > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kent Brown [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:51 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > > > +1 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 6:57 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > > > AFAIK, only committers are allowed to vote after testing. Others can > report > > any errors in the pack. > > > > Regards, > > Shankar > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Kamaljit Bath > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Just trying to understand the rules - who is allowed to vote? Only if > you > > > have personally tested the bits or if you have committer status? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 8:19 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > > > > > Cool and +1 > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:22 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > > > > > Hi Drew, > > > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Drew Baird (Volt) > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Has anyone done a Linux/PHP -> Windows/dotnet scenario or the > reverse? > > > > > > > > > I tested dotnet_client -> PHP BS (linux) -> PHP OPS (linux) and it > worked > > > fine. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Shankar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it needed for M1? On one hand it might be required by the > > > > mentors/managers however I think we said originally that we wanted > (for > > > M1) > > > > to meet the level of interoperability demonstrated by MSFT/WSO2 in > the > > > > original demo. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Drew > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Ben Dewey [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:19 AM > > > > To: '[email protected]' > > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > > > > > > > Clean install of the binaries.zip worked. > > > > > > > > Installed DB and ran thru the entire interop guide successfully. > > > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > > > Interop guide has: > > > > -------------------- > > > > .NET Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS > > > > PHP Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS > > > > .NET Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS > > > > PHP Client -> WSAS BS -> WSAS OPS > > > > PHP Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS > > > > .NET Client -> PHP BS -> .NET OPS > > > > .NET Client -> PHP BS -> WSAS OPSSEC > > > > PHP Client -> .NET BS -> WSAS OPSSEC > > > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:55 AM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/> > > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/> > > > > > > > > The key is here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS> > > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS> > > > > > > > > RAT reports are here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/> > > > < > http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/> > > > > > > > > This release is tagged at: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge/tags/stonehenge_m1_incubator/ > > > > > > > > Note: The changes between this and the first take > > > > (1) Artifacts are built from tag > > > > > > > > Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache > > > Stonehenge > > > > M1 release. > > > > > > > > Here is my vote +1. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Shankar > > > > > > > > -- > > > > S.Uthaiyashankar > > > > Software Architect > > > > WSO2 Inc. > > > > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > S.Uthaiyashankar > > > Software Architect > > > WSO2 Inc. > > > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > S.Uthaiyashankar > > Software Architect > > WSO2 Inc. > > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > > > -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
