Just trying to understand the rules - who is allowed to vote? Only if you have 
personally tested the bits or if you have committer status?

-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 8:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)

Cool and +1

________________________________________
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)

Hi Drew,

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Drew Baird (Volt)
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Has anyone done a Linux/PHP -> Windows/dotnet scenario or the reverse?


I tested dotnet_client -> PHP BS (linux) -> PHP OPS (linux) and it worked
fine.

Regards,
Shankar



>
>
> Is it needed for M1?  On one hand it might be required by the
> mentors/managers however I think we said originally that we wanted (for M1)
> to meet the level of interoperability demonstrated by MSFT/WSO2 in the
> original demo.
>
> Thanks!
> Drew
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Dewey [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:19 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
>
> Clean install of the binaries.zip worked.
>
> Installed DB and ran thru the entire interop guide successfully.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Interop guide has:
> --------------------
> .NET Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS
> PHP Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS
> .NET Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS
> PHP Client -> WSAS BS -> WSAS OPS
> PHP Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS
> .NET Client -> PHP BS -> .NET OPS
> .NET Client -> PHP BS -> WSAS OPSSEC
> PHP Client -> .NET BS -> WSAS OPSSEC
>
> -Ben
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
>
> Hi,
>
> I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here:
> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/>
>
> The key is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS>
>
> RAT reports are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/>
>
> This release is tagged at:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge/tags/stonehenge_m1_incubator/
>
> Note: The changes between this and the first take
> (1) Artifacts are built from tag
>
> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache Stonehenge
> M1 release.
>
> Here is my vote +1.
>
> Regards,
> Shankar
>
> --
> S.Uthaiyashankar
> Software Architect
> WSO2 Inc.
> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
>
>


--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"

Reply via email to