AFAIK, only committers are allowed to vote after testing. Others can report
any errors in the pack.

Regards,
Shankar

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Kamaljit Bath
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Just trying to understand the rules - who is allowed to vote? Only if you
> have personally tested the bits or if you have committer status?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 8:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
>
> Cool and +1
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
>
> Hi Drew,
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Drew Baird (Volt)
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > Has anyone done a Linux/PHP -> Windows/dotnet scenario or the reverse?
>
>
> I tested dotnet_client -> PHP BS (linux) -> PHP OPS (linux) and it worked
> fine.
>
> Regards,
> Shankar
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Is it needed for M1?  On one hand it might be required by the
> > mentors/managers however I think we said originally that we wanted (for
> M1)
> > to meet the level of interoperability demonstrated by MSFT/WSO2 in the
> > original demo.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Drew
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Dewey [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:19 AM
> > To: '[email protected]'
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
> >
> > Clean install of the binaries.zip worked.
> >
> > Installed DB and ran thru the entire interop guide successfully.
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Interop guide has:
> > --------------------
> > .NET Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS
> > PHP Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS
> > .NET Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS
> > PHP Client -> WSAS BS -> WSAS OPS
> > PHP Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS
> > .NET Client -> PHP BS -> .NET OPS
> > .NET Client -> PHP BS -> WSAS OPSSEC
> > PHP Client -> .NET BS -> WSAS OPSSEC
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:55 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/>
> >
> > The key is here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS>
> >
> > RAT reports are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eshankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/>
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge/tags/stonehenge_m1_incubator/
> >
> > Note: The changes between this and the first take
> > (1) Artifacts are built from tag
> >
> > Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
> Stonehenge
> > M1 release.
> >
> > Here is my vote +1.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shankar
> >
> > --
> > S.Uthaiyashankar
> > Software Architect
> > WSO2 Inc.
> > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> S.Uthaiyashankar
> Software Architect
> WSO2 Inc.
> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
>



-- 
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"

Reply via email to