I'm looking for some suggestions here - I am an OSOL noob. I have used Linux 
mainly, and some FreeBSD. Originally I planned on using FreeBSD for this, but 
am a bit nervous about it's ZFS support, might as well run it on the native 
kernel, and the upcoming OSOL build has a lot of neat sounding features.

Basically, my plan is to build a machine I can stick at home that will do 
nightly rsyncs to servers that I administer for various reasons. When the rsync 
is done, create a snapshot. Essentially nightly snapshots on the receiver side, 
since I cannot change the OS/filesystem on the remote servers.

I'd plan on setting up one ZFS filesystem for each server. 15 at the most to 
start. Probably wouldn't grow very much more than that.

I'm looking at a few million files, no more than 2TB of data to start. But I'd 
want plenty of room to grow. I also might decide to use this machine for home 
media storage as well (so I'd be using CIFS and/or NFS clients to access it)

I'm looking for good hardware suggestions, I'd want 6 drives minimum. The main 
thing is finding a chassis that will keep all of this quiet. Then finding the 
right motherboard and/or extra SATA controller for more ports (if needed) with 
well-supported chipsets, etc.

Services: ssh, ftp (maybe), cifs, nfs (maybe)

How much RAM would you suggest for this? I'm thinking 4GB should handle these 
needs, but I have never adminned/dealt with a Solaris machine before.

I'd be planning on running this on an Intel Core2 architecture. Would a 
dual-core suffice? I assume so.

I'd be initiating the rsyncs at random times throughout the day - so it won't 
be one huge hit at once, if that helps at all.

Any help is appreciated. FYI, I got more tempted to jump ship and try OSOL for 
storage after reading this: 
http://elektronkind.org/2008/07/opensolaris-2008-11-storage

Thanks a ton!
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to