i used pronto on a k6-3 400 with 64 megs of ram for about 1/2 a year. just don't
have it check the mail to often ;)
but, i think you're REALLY overstating what it takes to run. i don't even notice it's
running anymore, k7 550 w/ 320
MBs of RAM. i think you'll be fine if you've got over 128 megs of ram. but yeah,
you can basicaly blame mysql for
taking up the resources.
oh wait.... were you using CSV? that right there would explain why you thought it
took an insane machine. because
unless you use an sql database with it, it is impossibly slow, and i'd rather use
_kmail_ than pronto if i can't have
my mysql.
On Sun, 30 Dec 2000 16:35:48 UTC, Shea Martin said:
> Pronto is great if you are running a PIII/Athlon 1.5GHz, w/ 1024MB of
> RAM. For those of us with a k6-II 400Mhz, w/ 64MB of RAM may want to
> avoid pronto. I admit thatfeaturewise, stability, and threading ability
> pronto is hard to beat.
>
> But Bynari's Tradeclient runs a close second and uses 1/3 the RAM of
> Pronto.
>
> Sylpheed would probably be my fav. if it could multi-thread. Auther
> claims it can, but it locks up while sending or recieving. Don't worry,
> it unlocks after.
>
> Shea Martin
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
> Duke of Silton
> &
> Earl of S'toon
> ###########
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stormlinux-users-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.stormix.com/community/lists/listinfo/stormlinux-users-list
>
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"I don't like this air, but that doesn't
mean I'm going to stop breathing."
-Doug Martsch
_______________________________________________
Stormlinux-users-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stormix.com/community/lists/listinfo/stormlinux-users-list
