On Sat, 30 Dec 2000 12:40:28 -0800, Mircea Luca said:
> Forrest English wrote:
>
> >
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > anyhow, i don't even know why i'm blabbering about pronto. i like it. it works
>for me. and maybe other people. if
> > you don't like it, please, use somthing else, and tell us about it! obviously
>there is never going to be a perfect
> > e-mail client, or browser, or file manager or, os for that matter that is going
>to make everyone involved happy.
> > everyone has diffferent requirements, different system specs, and different
>levels of comfort with linux. so, yeah,
> > whatever works :)
> >
>
> HI
>
> I didn't even try it.I said that the idea of having mysql installed just to read
>my mail it's repulsive. Same for
> the requirements.
>
> I do agree that whatever works though.
> For me Nescape Mail works(to bad you can't use it witout Netscape),kmail works now
>in KDE2 ,balsa is close,
> mahogany seems to be coming along,heck even mailx is "fine"(ugh) for console only.
> Still back to the point..what would you recommend to somebody like the original
>poster who asked what is a good_small mail
> reader for X. ? maybe we should " Ask Slashdot " and enjoy the flames. :-)
wait, anyone on slashdot actually _uses_ linux? hmm,i thought it was just a couple
of the editors.. <g>
um, light gui e-mail client...
the old version 1.2 kmail was pretty light, lacking of TONS of features (like filters,
sending from multiple addesses,
etc, etc). but, spruce is what i'd recomend.
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"I don't like this air, but that doesn't
mean I'm going to stop breathing."
-Doug Martsch
_______________________________________________
Stormlinux-users-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stormix.com/community/lists/listinfo/stormlinux-users-list
