Kevin

   I presume this question is because of my statement below about " ...the need 
to eliminate fossil fuels altogether..?

   My statement about superior cleanliness for TLUDs  has been on this list at 
least a dozen times - especially from Dean and Paul Anderson.  Look up what is 
said about the Philips stove.

   I'll go doing  a bigger search as soon as you answer mr last request for a 
real cite?

Ron

On May 27, 2013, at 8:08 PM, "Kevin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Ron
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 1:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Stoves] Advancement of "better" stoves
> 
> Dean:
> 
>      I know you know this, but some of us are in the stove development 
> "business" because we want messages like yours below to also include the 
> words "carbon negative"  Surprisingly, those stoves that can be carbon 
> negative seem also to have the cleanest combustion.  
>  
> # 1: Specifically, what kinds of stoves are you talking about?
>  
> #2: Do you have any measurements that you can present to show that such 
> "carbon negative stoves" have cleaner combustion than other stoves which are 
> not "carbon negative"?
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Kevin
>  
>  
> Paul O's seems to be in this nice class.   This is not to mention the global 
> need for soil improvement, the need to eliminate fossil fuels altogether, and 
> other benefits like low or negative annual cost that come with biochar
> 
>     I repeat that I know you know this.  Some on this list don't.   
> 
>     Thanks for all that you and Aprovecho are doing to advance the science of 
> (especially clean) stove operation.
> 
>   Ron
> 
> From: "Dean Still" <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 9:47:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Stoves] Advancement of "better" stoves
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Let's remember that although burning natural gas when cooking adds CO2 to the 
> atmosphere and sustainably harvested biomass can be carbon neutral, the 
> biomass has to be completely combusted not to damage health, etc. 
> 
> Complete combustion of biomass is a goal not yet a reality.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Dean
> 
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Paul Olivier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Design stoves that are functional, safe and efficient. And don't forget, to 
> design stoves that can be situated in modern kitchens. Getting rich people in 
> developed countries to use biomass stoves should be one of our big 
> priorities. I think that many of us grossly underestimate the power of the 
> tlud concept. Imagine a small tlud less than 10 inches in height; made of 
> high quality, long-lasting stainless steel; holding no more than about three 
> or four cups of wood or straw pellets; capable of putting out 2 to 3 kW of 
> heat over enough time to cook an average meal; elegantly contoured to match 
> in beauty high-end kitchen accessories. Such a stove need not cost more than 
> $50 US to fabricate. It would produce a beautiful blue flame that would rival 
> that of a bottled gas stove. It would produce a valuable biochar for farms 
> and gardens. It would be proudly used in London or Laos, Boston or 
> Bangladesh. It would appeal to rich and poor alike. 
> 
> Of course we can build cheap, tin can stoves. But why should we expect poor 
> people to use them, while we would never dream of doing so, except, perhaps, 
> on an occasional camping trip?
> 
> Paul Olivier
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:12 PM, mtrevor <[email protected]> wrote:
> I concur with Dr Tluds points and think in particular Dr Belonio, Dr. Nurhuda 
> and Paul Oliver all seem to have stoves that could easily be poised to go 
> commercial big time. They seem  to work beautifully,  are physically good 
> looking and are close to good fuel sources. In addition they are located in 
> places where industrial and mechanical means of manufature exist.
> Not all of the rest of the world is so fortunate. While these stoves are 
> relatively economical obtaining them is another issue. While a stove could be 
> worth $25.00 $50.00 or even maybe $100.00 having to pay $200.00 $300 or 
> $400.00 to obtain a sample for testing is beyond practicality. No matter what 
> efforts are expended tincanium and hammered tin has little appeal here. In 
> these day of ipads and iphones style is a major hurdle.
>  
> Lurking in the backgound at the end of the earth.
>  
> Michael N Trevor
> Marshall Islands 
>  
> .  
>  
> From: Paul Anderson
> To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
> Cc: Otto Formo
> Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 11:28 PM
> Subject: [Stoves] Specifics about advancement of TLUD stoves Re: fan 
> expertise?
> 
> Dear all,   This is a different and more specific reply to Otto's message.
> 
> I see four things that will greatly advance the position of micro-gasifier 
> stoves, specifically the TLUD stoves.   I am working on all four of them.
> 
> 1.  Prove that stove users will accept TLUD gasifier stoves (at reasonable 
> price, but this is not about price.) and (with a reasonable supply chain for 
> appropriate fuels, but this is not about fuels) :  
> 
> We lack meaningful studies that show that TLUD stoves (when available and 
> with fuels available) are accepted by "typical" cookstove users in any 
> significant segment of the population.   We need some documentation that xx 
> number of TLUD users (out of yy number of households that seriously tried 
> TLUD stoves) are still using the stoves zz percent of the time for their 
> cooking, and this is over time periods that are checked again and again each 
> few months.    Comments from users should be reported.
> 
> Start small, and do it well.   The money for the bigger studies will follow 
> success with the small numbers.    This is NOT about sales.   This is about 
> sustained usage.
> 
> We are working on this topic at Awamu in Uganda with the Quad TLUD stove, but 
> no results to report at this time.    Is anyone else doing such studies?
> 
> 2.  Compilation of past results and further data collection about emissions 
> and efficiencies of TLUD stoves.  Some TLUD have had major success.   And 
> others "suck".   Which ones and why?   We seek data from the stove testing 
> centers.   We also will do further work at Stove Camps in the coming 3 months.
> 
> 3.  Prove the capacities to produce sufficient numbers of TLUD stoves with 
> excellent functioning.   The response must be credible for numbers of many 
> 10s of thousands for stoves per year.   20 tinsmiths seated in a factory is 
> not sufficient proof.   Prof. Nurhuda has shown that metal stamping can 
> produce his TLUD stoves with good quality.   I do not doubt that capacity 
> worldwide could be sufficient when demand is there, but with the goal of 
> creating in-country jobs, for most situations "proof" is still not in hand.
> 
> 4.  Bring the price below US$10 for the low-end products that are still 
> functional about emissions and efficiencies.    I am working on this and I 
> hope to report about it at the July stove camp at Aprovecho where TLUD stoves 
> are a focal issue.
> 
> Note that I did NOT add on having different TLUD stoves such as the ones with 
> fans like Ron is discussing.   When they become available, that will be 
> wonderful.  But then such stoves will still need to be considered regarding # 
> 1 and #2 and #3 above.   They might be the breakthrough for gaining 
> acceptance, or lower emissions, or whatever.
> 
> Paul
> 
> Paul S. Anderson, PhD  aka "Dr TLUD"
> Email:  [email protected]   Skype: paultlud  Phone: +1-309-452-7072
> Website:  www.drtlud.com
> On 5/26/2013 2:46 AM, Otto Formo wrote:
> Ron
>  
> I do not see any point in arguing with all and anybody, to try to convince 
> them , that gasifing of biomass are here to BE and will develop more rapidly, 
> than anyone ever belived.
>  
> What about the issue of biomass as fuel?
> Here are a LOT of challanges in preparation, production, handeling etc.
>  
> Paul A and Ron, 
> If, "Open Source", realy means something to you, then create a group of 
> "belivers" and start from there.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Otto
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
> 
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3184/6358 - Release Date: 05/25/13
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul A. Olivier PhD
> 26/5 Phu Dong Thien Vuong
> Dalat
> Vietnam
> 
> Louisiana telephone: 1-337-447-4124 (rings Vietnam)
> Mobile: 090-694-1573 (in Vietnam)
> Skype address: Xpolivier
> http://www.esrla.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
> 
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to