My solution is that all the traffic should go somewhere else.

--David Shove
Roseville


On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, John Birrenbach wrote:

> At 9:48 AM -0500 10/20/04, Chris Boylan wrote:
> >I think Snelling is rated as a county highway
>
> W7th is A highway as well #5 :-)
>
> At 9:21 AM -0500 10/20/04, Tim Erickson wrote:
> >From what I've heard, only a section of W7th has been restriped, the
> >busiest portions remain two lanes in each direction (is this
> >correct).
> >
>
> I don't know that you can call the area that was re-striped as one of
> the least used section of W7th. Certainly not as busy as the area
> around Chestnut, but we do have plenty of Traffic on W7th (Much of it
> diverted purposely from 35E).  Sure near DT it's like Snelling and
> 94, and to a lesser degree in the area that was re-striped.  But
> there are several things to really consider about the area re-striped.
>
> 1.  The area is a MAJOR truck route.  With no trucks allowed on 35E,
> and the semi-industrial nature of the area of W7th we have lots and
> lots of trucks.  Now put on some limits on trucks on W7th and divert
> them off onto Sheppard would be smart, but THAT didn't happen.
>
> 2.  The area is an area that is for the majority has speed limits
> ABOVE 30 mph.  YES much of W7th St actually has speed limits of
> 40mph.  Only a very small portion (the area around the brewery) of
> that which was re-striped was in a 30 mph zone, the rest is 35-40 mph
> zones.
>
> >My own sense, as an amateur observer (without traffic statistics) is
> >that W7th can handle the traffic, even reduced to one lane. I very
> >much doubt that the same is true of Snelling.
>
> Well there are many sections of Snelling I can think of that could be
> reduced to one lane.  Particularly the area from Highland Highschool
> all the way down to Grand Ave, maybe even as far as Selby.  From my
> casual observance of Snelling and comparing it to this section of
> W7th they have much the same sorts of traffic patterns (ie heavy in
> the morning and afternoon rushs, but slower the rest of the day).
>
> >I'm not convinced that the intention was really to divert traffic
> >off of West 7th.
>
> Well that is what those that wanted it have stated was the purpose,
> now your throwing conspiracy's around :-)  ... But if we really
> wanted to reduce the traffic and in particular the Heavy Trucks would
> have been to put up inexpensive signs saying No Trucks, Local
> Delivery only, and signs on 35 diverting Trucks to Sheppard rather
> than up W7th (but then they can't get back to the freeway from
> Sheppard can they without going through DT).  Reduce the speedlimits
> along all of W7th to 30 mph would have slowed alot of people from
> using the road (that is why they like it, get off 35 at 7th st head
> DT and you beat those on 35 during rush hour).
>
> See this is why people are nervous about all of this, we have already
> been screwed over by "Traffic Experts" enough times already (35 E,
> Redesign of Sheppard Road) not to mention the number of times the
> City has told us "Don't Worry Be Happy, we are helping you" only to
> have it backfire leaves anyone who has lived down here long enough to
> be gun shy of any sorts of changes.  Especially those that just
> suddenly appear as if by magic.  We like our neighborhood the way it
> was when we moved in, that is why we moved here :-)
>
> >Any other ideas for streets that ought to be restriped?
>
> In my prior post I explained a number that could.  Under the same
> theory tossed out by the proponents of W 7th re-striping.
>
> 1.  W7th could easily be re-striped all the way to Smith Ave,
> probably even to Grand Ave and a few blocks further.
> 2.  Maryland both directions off of 35E
> 3.  E7th St from just North of DT up to Arcade
> 4.  Arcade from E7th St North I am not sure how far
> 5.  Many sections of University Ave.. Rice St to Dale or even
> Hamline, from the otherside of Snelling all the way to the boarder
> with Mpls
> 6  Rice St from University Ave N to the RR tracks
> 7.  Much of Snelling Ave S
> 8  All of Lexington Ave (especially north of University)
>
> Heck we could probably even do Randolph Ave from W7th all the way to
> Snelling, Jefferson Ave (certainly the area from W7th all the way to
> Lexington).
>
> I have had a chance to go all the way up and down the new stripped
> area, and frankly it's pretty silly.  There are HUGH sections where
> there is no place to turn left and there is the Left Turn Lane.
>
> On the other hand of course if I want to hang a U-Turn in the middle
> of the block so I can get to Dave's Gallery it's a whole lot easier
> cause I got that middle lane.  I have yet to take the time to try it
> during the Rush Hour, when I suspect it's a nightmare.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> John Birrenbach
> W 7th Neighborhood, St Paul MN
> === Political & Business Consulting ===
> http://www.birrenbach.com/
> ======================================
> "Six years on the council has trained me to feign interest for long
> periods of time"
> Chris Coleman Jan 21, 2004
> +++++++++++++++
> _____________________________________________
> To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
>
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
>
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to