With all due respect to Chris, I believe he is
mistaken on two points.

I haven't looked at the I-35E settlement since earlier
this year, (since 60 Speed Wilkin wanted to increase
the speed limit), but I do not believe that a direct
connection between I-94 eastbound to I-35 southbound
and likewise I-35E Northbound into I-94 westbound is
banned under the settlement. From what I understand it
is not now possible from an engineering point of view.
I discussed these options with a D.O.T. engineer at
one of the Ayd Mill Road meetings, (please do not ask
me who it was, as I don't recall), but he said that to
build a ramp from eastbound I-94 to I-35 is too much
of a drop.

I personally walked it later, and deemed it would be
possible, IF THE STATE WERE TO TUNNEL UNDER THE
HISTORY CENTER or DEMOLISH THE HISTORY CENTER FOR A
RAMP.

The second point Chris raises is NIMBY or Not in My
Backyard. This is not just me speaking. The 35E
settlement was negotiated, in Federal Court, a decade
before I moved to Summit Hill. We simply would be
assuring that a previous Federal Court settlement is
being enforced. What would be the good of Federal
settlements, or any settlement, if it could be set
aside as soon as the people who negotiated it, died
off or public/institutional memory forgot about it.

The settlement was negotiated to allow the highway to
be built in the first place. The other option was no
highway at all. It was a fair and reasonable
settlement then and I would argue that suburbanites
certainly got the better part of the deal. Just try
driving 45 in the left land at any time. Just the
other day I drove 50 in the left lane parallel with a
school bus and had a woman in a large SUV tailgate me,
repeatedly honk her horn and then give me the finger,
all because I didn't want to exceed the speed limit by
as much as she wanted to exceed it. 

I used to argue that Norm and Randy could pay for a
new Twins Stadium by just rigidly enforcing the speed
limit on 35E. But that might p.o. to many suburban
voters and you can't do that if . . . 

Dan Dobson
Summit Hill - Saint Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- Chris Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > 
> > Any attempt to raise the speed limit or introduce
> > large trucks on this portion of 35E would be met
> > forcefully with legal action, in Federal Court, to
> > enforce the original agreement. 
> > 
> 
> And that's our traffic problem in a nutshell - not
> in my backyard.
> How are we going to deal with this?
> 
> No offense to our neighbors in Summit-Hill but that
> traffic has to go 
> somewhere and because government rolled over as part
> of this settlement 
> that means Snelling, Ayd Mill road (Selby),
> Lexington and W 7th get this 
> spill over freeway traffic because those cars are
> NOT going away, they 
> are just going somewhere else.  
> 
> While I personally think trucks on 35E would be bad
> and raising the speed 
> limit probably pointless at this point [45MPH in
> rush hour?  Don't you 
> wish?], I believe the settlement also prohibited a
> direct east-bound 94 
> to south bound 35E connection and therefore
> something in excessive of 
> 25,000 cars wander through the W. 7th and Lexington
> areas to connect.  
> 
> Someone correct me if I remember the settlement
> terms incorrectly or the 
> car count wrong.  
> 
> Doesn't $3.99 gasoline sound like a good idea?
> 
> Chris Boylan
> Mac-Groveland & Downtown
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your
> password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
> 
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
> 

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to