On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]>wrote:
> You're obfuscating now, mex. The topic wasn't elitism, or allusion or > whether PhDs are the problem (which, BTW, i never said). It wasn't about > consumerism. (I still don't know why you dragged that into the discussion.) > It wasn't about Glenn Beck and his restoring honor rally. > > It was about who the Tea Partiers are, what they want, who they support and > why, and who they oppose. > exactly > > Apparently, you're unwilling to change your views from those imparted on > you by the political and media elites. > > > That's okay with me, as it tends to work in favor of the Tea Partiers. > > On Sep 18, 2010, at 2:59 PM, mex sara wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 12:44 AM, mex sara wrote: >> >> > On 9/18/10, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sep 17, 2010, at 4:59 PM, mex sara wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Francis Drouillard < >> [email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> If you're interested in the truth about Tea Partiers, you may want to >> read >> >>> this article: >> >>> >> >>> < >> http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/09/16/2010-09-16_stop_mocking_the_tea_party_if_anyone_is_nuts_its_the_elites_and_incumbents.html >> > >> >>> >> >>> My only quibble with her take is that the Tea Party is more of a >> political >> >>> movement or awakening than an organized political party, and one that >> >>> befuddles and confuses both major political parties. >> >>> >> >>> i cringe at the term 'elites' .... >> >> >> >> Perhaps you identify with them? >> > > > i guess if your for anyone who is against what you are against regardless > of consequences > > > That would be "you're," but hey, who's keeping track? Other than that, I > really don't know what it is you're trying to say. > > if you are for a Cultural Revolution [ in that particularly Moaist sense > though driven by News Ltd ] because it is against > > what you are against ... enjoy it though personally i hope you escape the > related baggage cause it will be nasty > > > Oooh, the fear card. It can't get any worse than Obama has made it. He took > the worst of Bush's spending policies and tripled them. It'll take decades > to fix what he has done. His deficit spending exceeds that of all previous > presidents combined, and we've gotten nothing for it but a bigger hole. > > I've had enough change -- I'm for a restoration of the founding principals. > Smaller, limited federal government. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<stratalist-ot%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
