On Sep 18, 2010, at 4:27 PM, mex sara wrote: >> >> >> >> i guess if your for anyone who is against what you are against regardless of >> consequences > > That would be "you're," but hey, who's keeping track? Other than that, I > really don't know what it is you're trying to say. > > > well you seem to me to send endless links to articles that are anti Obama > regardless of how nutty they are
Sniffles, dearie. You may find those articles "nutty," but they paint an accurate picture of American's displeasure with Obama's policies and the effect of those policies. However, if you're tired of reading news that's bad for Obama, here's a recently published poll regarding the Tea Party movement: <http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/september_2010/calling_someone_a_tea_party_candidate_has_bigger_impact_than_traditional_labels> I'll bet I can guess where you fall on the spectrum. > some of those articles lead me to think there is a nasty whiff of propaganda > of the type that is just Us against Them It takes two to Tango, darlin'. > surely i don't have to spell out where that [ historically leads] That's only a concern when there's leftist takeover, as with Stalin, Hitler, Castro, Pol Pot and a litany of other Godless cretans. When it's based on peaceful resistance and change, good things result, as with the American Revolution, Ghandi and Indian Independence and Martin Luther King's Civil Rights movement. This time around it's going to lead to a restoration of the principals that made America great and all other countries kind of sucky by comparison. > “Fiat ars, pereat mundus” Again in English, please. Recall, I'm just an ignorant rube that doesn't understand the benefits of liberalism and the nanny state. > > >> if you are for a Cultural Revolution [ in that particularly Moaist sense >> though driven by News Ltd ] because it is against >> >> what you are against ... enjoy it though personally i hope you escape the >> related baggage cause it will be nasty > > Oooh, the fear card. It can't get any worse than Obama has made it. He took > the worst of Bush's spending policies and tripled them. It'll take decades to > fix what he has done. His deficit spending exceeds that of all previous > presidents combined, and we've gotten nothing for it but a bigger hole. > > > wealthy people paying less taxes wont help and supporting people who jump on > that bandwagon for their own individual gain wont help either > > > > I've had enough change -- I'm for a restoration of the founding principals. > Smaller, limited federal government. > > > fair enough but the worlds changed .... > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
