On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]>wrote:
> You're obfuscating now, mex. The topic wasn't elitism, or allusion or > whether PhDs are the problem (which, BTW, i never said). It wasn't about > consumerism. (I still don't know why you dragged that into the discussion.) > It wasn't about Glenn Beck and his restoring honor rally. > > It was about who the Tea Partiers are, what they want, who they support and > why, and who they oppose. > > Apparently, you're unwilling to change your views from those imparted on > you by the political and media elites. > > That's okay with me, as it tends to work in favor of the Tea Partiers. > > On Sep 18, 2010, at 2:59 PM, mex sara wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Sep 18, 2010, at 12:44 AM, mex sara wrote: >> >> > On 9/18/10, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sep 17, 2010, at 4:59 PM, mex sara wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Francis Drouillard < >> [email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> If you're interested in the truth about Tea Partiers, you may want to >> read >> >>> this article: >> >>> >> >>> < >> http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/09/16/2010-09-16_stop_mocking_the_tea_party_if_anyone_is_nuts_its_the_elites_and_incumbents.html >> > >> >>> >> >>> My only quibble with her take is that the Tea Party is more of a >> political >> >>> movement or awakening than an organized political party, and one that >> >>> befuddles and confuses both major political parties. >> >>> >> >>> i cringe at the term 'elites' .... >> >> >> >> Perhaps you identify with them? >> > > > i guess if your for anyone who is against what you are against regardless > of consequences > > > That would be "you're," but hey, who's keeping track? Other than that, I > really don't know what it is you're trying to say. > well you seem to me to send endless links to articles that are anti Obama regardless of how nutty they are some of those articles lead me to think there is a nasty whiff of propaganda of the type that is just Us against Them surely i don't have to spell out where that [ historically leads] “Fiat ars, pereat mundus” > if you are for a Cultural Revolution [ in that particularly Moaist sense > though driven by News Ltd ] because it is against > > what you are against ... enjoy it though personally i hope you escape the > related baggage cause it will be nasty > > > Oooh, the fear card. It can't get any worse than Obama has made it. He took > the worst of Bush's spending policies and tripled them. It'll take decades > to fix what he has done. His deficit spending exceeds that of all previous > presidents combined, and we've gotten nothing for it but a bigger hole. > wealthy people paying less taxes wont help and supporting people who jump on that bandwagon for their own individual gain wont help either > > I've had enough change -- I'm for a restoration of the founding principals. > Smaller, limited federal government. > fair enough but the worlds changed .... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<stratalist-ot%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
