More off the mark, tit-for-tat idiocy from richardsan.

The point is that we must strike a balance between law and order and government 
power. It has nothing to do with how much bureaucrats are paid.

Some buffoons are willing to grant the state limitless power to redistribute 
wealth, but fail to recognize that same state needs limitless police powers to 
accomplish that feat.

On Oct 2, 2011, at 6:25 AM, richardsan wrote:

> "We like lawfulness and order, but we also don't want to entrust any more 
> power to government than necessary. Abuse of power by policemen, as by EPA 
> bureaucrats, illustrates why we conservatives want more power in private 
> hands, and less in public."
> 
> they won't work for free. you guys don't have any follow up to any of what 
> you're proposing. privatisation isn't any different than the way things are 
> done  right now. it's the grand old lie.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

Reply via email to