On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote:
> More off the mark, tit-for-tat idiocy from richardsan. > before you go off on a body parts tangent, how about dealing with the inadequacies i mentioned? you guys don't have a plan "after" you take over the world... > > The point is that we must strike a balance between law and order and > government power. It has nothing to do with how much bureaucrats are paid. > > Some buffoons are willing to grant the state limitless power to > redistribute wealth, but fail to recognize that same state needs limitless > police powers to accomplish that feat. > > On Oct 2, 2011, at 6:25 AM, richardsan wrote: > > "We like lawfulness and order, but we also don't want to entrust any more >> power to government than necessary. Abuse of power by policemen, as by EPA >> bureaucrats, illustrates why we conservatives want more power in private >> hands, and less in public." >> > > they won't work for free. you guys don't have any follow up to any of what > you're proposing. privatisation isn't any different than the way things are > done right now. it's the grand old lie. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "StrataList-OT" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en. > -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
