[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think it looks OK. The heading sequence at the top of the page looks a bit > odd, but I'm sure we can improve on that later. The main thing is that we > preserve the notion of a single source that generates both the TLD and the > documentation, so that they are always in lock step. I have some tweaks to do on this, but it looks like it will work out. -Ted.
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 martin . cooper
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 martin . cooper
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 martin . cooper
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 martin . cooper
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 martin . cooper
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 Ted Husted
- Re: Updating Site for Struts 1.1 martin . cooper