[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd simply suggest that we be consistent. If we are going to put vital,
> high-level documentation there for the tag libraries, then we should
> follow suit for the other packages. Or vice-versa.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Having looked at what you've done so far, I'll reverse my opinion on this.
> :-) Incorporating the package information into the body of the user guide
> looks like the right way to go.
What I'm working on now is converting the package.html's to
package.xml's, so we can generate an overview for the Javadoc and a
section for the user's guide from the same XML source, same as the TLDs
;-)
I'm just trying a q&d switch for now, but we could eventually setup a
"Developers Guide" stylesheet, to improve the formatting.
Sound like a plan?
-Ted.
