Thanks for the link. I've never used xml schema and most xml I've seen is validated against a dtd but it's nice that it's there.
Should I post this to bugzilla or does one of the committers want to quickly remove that line from the dtd? Dave >From: "James Childers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: struts-config_1_1.dtd error? >Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:14:18 -0500 > >David Graham wrote: > > > The struts-config_1_1.dtd file starts with this line: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > > > > which I think is incorrect. DTDs aren't xml documents so > > they shouldn't start with that processing instruction. > > I'm not an XML expert but Sun's DTDs don't have this line > > in them and it causes Opera to complain about xml > > parsing errors when trying to view it. > >You are correct. DTDs are not XML documents, and are processed quite >differently. It is because of this and other reasons that schemas were >proposed and made a recommendation by the W3C. Schemas serve a similar >purpose to DTDs, but are themselves XML documents. > >This explains the difference between the two: >http://www.ucc.ie/xml/#schemas > >In short, the PI should be removed from the DTD, and Opera's parser was >correct to complain about it. > >-= James > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
