<snip> To para-paraphrase, "We ARE the implementation, therefore however it works it how it works. </snip>
There is a distinct appeal (from a developers viewpoint) to having only one particular implementations annoying idiosyncrasies to workaround. ...well at least till the next version comes out... <sigh/> -----Original Message----- From: Joe Hertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 December 2003 14:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better. It was left handed bashing. To paraphrase- "Bill was announcing .NET when Struts was only a glimmer in Craig's eye". "Microsoft is committed to .NET and therefore .NET is Windows. With Struts/J2EE you are at the mercy of whoever develops the implementation of the Servlet Container, et al, or maybe one day does a bad job, or stops entirely maybe". I chuckled at the 2nd line of thought. Most of us consider this a benefit of J2EE Dev. But it also implies this wasn't potentially a problem with .NET and Windows. To para-paraphrase, "We ARE the implementation, therefore however it works it how it works. We dont need no steeeeenking BugZilla. Grunt Grunt. Competition bad.". > I didn't notice any bashing going on. I found it to be a pretty good > article pointing out high level differences between developing with Struts > vs. an ASP.NET approach. From an agnostic approach, it was a pretty good > article. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
